Spatial Planning Response to the Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation: An Analysis of Selected Instruments and Good Practices in Europe
被引:10
作者:
Nowak, Maciej J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
West Pomeranian Univ Technol, Fac Econ, Dept Real Estate, PL-70310 Szczecin, PolandWest Pomeranian Univ Technol, Fac Econ, Dept Real Estate, PL-70310 Szczecin, Poland
Nowak, Maciej J.
[1
]
Monteiro, Renato
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
NOVA Univ Lisbon, MARE Marine & Environm Sci Ctr, NOVA Sch Sci & Technol, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Campus Caparica, P-2829516 Caparica, PortugalWest Pomeranian Univ Technol, Fac Econ, Dept Real Estate, PL-70310 Szczecin, Poland
spatial planning;
climate change adaptation;
green infrastructure;
renewable energy investments;
Europe;
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE;
FRAMEWORK;
GIS;
UK;
D O I:
10.3390/su151310431
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
The task of combining objectives, spatial planning instruments, and climate change adaptation targets is a complex endeavour that varies across countries. There is a call for a universal discussion on how spatial planning should respond to climate change challenges. To address this issue, this article delves into the approaches taken by Greece, Spain, Portugal, and Poland, aiming to explore how spatial planning instruments support climate change adaptation goals. The authors, based on a jointly extracted questionnaire, identified what they consider to be the most relevant examples of instruments to use to ensure the integration of spatial planning objectives and the response to climate challenges. The identified solutions are compared in detail. Three key spatial planning themes emerged in this study: investment in renewable energy, the development and preservation of green infrastructure, and the protection of coastal zones. This article examines the systemic solutions found in these countries, discusses the role of both classical and sectoral spatial planning instruments, and identifies the level of public authority responsible for key interventions. It shows that instruments developed at the supra-local level should support local authorities by providing them with legal and substantive arguments for developing solutions relevant to climate challenges.