Are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: No evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks

被引:5
作者
Rhilinger, Joshua P. [1 ]
Xu, Chenlingxi [1 ]
Rose, Nathan S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, 390 Corbett Family Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Working memory; Deletion; Removal; Suppression; Bias; Repulsion; Attraction; SERIAL DEPENDENCE; ATTENTION; FOCUS; MODEL; FATE;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-023-02724-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Some theories propose that working memory (WM) involves the active deletion of irrelevant information, including items that were retained in WM, but are no longer relevant for ongoing cognition. Considerable evidence suggests that active-deletion occurs for categorical representations, but whether it also occurs for recall of features that are typically bound together in an object, such as line orientations, is unclear. In two experiments, with or without binding instructions, healthy young adults maintained two orientations, focused attention to recall the orientation cued first, and then switched attention to recall the orientation cued second, at which point the uncued orientation was no longer relevant on the trial. In contrast to the active-deletion hypothesis, the results showed that the no-longer-relevant items exerted the strongest bias on participants' recall, which was either repulsive or attractive depending on both the degree of difference between the target and nontarget orientations and the proximity to cardinal axes. We suggest that visual WM can bind features like line orientations into chunked representations, and an irrelevant feature of a chunked object cannot be actively deleted - it biases recall of the target feature. Models of WM need to be updated to explain this and related dynamic phenomena.
引用
收藏
页码:1499 / 1516
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Accurate and Rapid Estimation of Phosphene Thresholds (REPT) [J].
Abrahamyan, Arman ;
Clifford, Colin W. G. ;
Ruzzoli, Manuela ;
Phillips, Dan ;
Arabzadeh, Ehsan ;
Harris, Justin A. .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (07)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Variation in Working Memory, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168648.003.0009, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195168648.003.0009, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195168648.003]
[3]   Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies [J].
Baddeley, Alan .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 63, 2012, 63 :1-29
[4]   Reactivation of Previous Experiences in a Working Memory Task [J].
Bae, Gi-Yeul ;
Luck, Steven J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (04) :587-595
[5]   Interactions between visual working memory representations [J].
Bae, Gi-Yeul ;
Luck, Steven J. .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2017, 79 (08) :2376-2395
[6]   A neural model of retrospective attention in visual working memory [J].
Bays, Paul M. ;
Taylor, Robert .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 100 :43-52
[7]   The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource [J].
Bays, Paul M. ;
Catalao, Raquel F. G. ;
Husain, Masud .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (10)
[8]   Serial dependence is absent at the time of perception but increases in visual working memory [J].
Bliss, Daniel P. ;
Sun, Jerome J. ;
D'Esposito, Mark .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[9]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[10]   An Adaptive Perspective on Visual Working Memory Distortions [J].
Chunharas, Chaipat ;
Rademaker, Rosanne L. ;
Brady, Timothy F. ;
Serences, John T. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2022, 151 (10) :2300-2323