Strategic interaction in environmental regulation and sulfur dioxide emissions: Evidence from China

被引:27
作者
Wang, Penghao [1 ]
Lu, Zheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Wuhan 430073, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Sch Econ, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Strategic interaction; Sulfur dioxide emissions; SDM model; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY; POLLUTING FIRMS; POLICY; ENERGY; COMPETITION; GROWTH; HYPOTHESIS; INNOVATION; REDUCTION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162620
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental regulation is the central government's main instrument for pollution control, but its actual implemen-tation effect directly depends on the level of enforcement by local governments. Using panel data of 30 regions in Mainland China from 2004 to 2020 and a spatial Durbin model, we investigated the effects of strategic interaction among local governments in environmental regulation on sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions. We found a "race to the top" behavior in the enforcement of environmental regulation among China's local governments. The enhancement of environmental regulation in a region or in its adjacent regions can significantly reduce SO2 emissions in that region, indicating that joint environmental governance can achieve considerable pollution control effects. Furthermore, influ-ence mechanism analysis shows that the emission reduction effect of environmental regulation is primarily achieved through green innovation and finance. In addition, we found that environmental regulation has a significant negative impact on SO2 emissions in low-energy-consuming regions, but not in high-energy-consuming regions. Our findings indicate that China should continue to implement and deepen the green performance appraisal system for local gov-ernments and improve the efficiency of environmental regulations in high-energy-consuming regions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 99 条
[21]   The impact of environmental regulation efficiency loss on inclusive growth: Evidence from China [J].
Ge, Tao ;
Qiu, Wei ;
Li, Jinye ;
Hao, Xionglei .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 268 (268)
[22]   The impacts of environmental regulations on industrial activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Act amendments and the Census of Manufactures [J].
Greenstone, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2002, 110 (06) :1175-1219
[23]   The socioeconomic drivers of China's primary PM2.5 emissions [J].
Guan, Dabo ;
Su, Xin ;
Zhang, Qiang ;
Peters, Glen P. ;
Liu, Zhu ;
Lei, Yu ;
He, Kebin .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 (02)
[24]   Closing the green finance gap - A systems perspective [J].
Hafner, Sarah ;
Jones, Aled ;
Anger-Kraavi, Annela ;
Pohl, Jan .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2020, 34 :26-60
[25]   Air pollution and its control in China [J].
Hao J. ;
He K. ;
Duan L. ;
Li J. ;
Wang L. .
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2007, 1 (2) :129-142
[26]   What is the role of openness for China's aggregate industrial SO2 emission?: A structural analysis based on the Divisia decomposition method [J].
He, Jie .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (04) :868-886
[27]   Pollution incidence and political jurisdiction: evidence from the TRI [J].
Helland, E ;
Whitford, AB .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (03) :403-424
[28]   Environmental policy and exports: Evidence from Chinese cities [J].
Hering, Laura ;
Poncet, Sandra .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 68 (02) :296-318
[29]   Does environment centralization prevent local governments from racing to the bottom? -Evidence from China [J].
Hong, Tao ;
Yu, Nannan ;
Mao, Zhonggen .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 :649-659
[30]   Does the SO2 emissions trading scheme encourage green total factor productivity? An empirical assessment on China's cities [J].
Hou, Bingqing ;
Wang, Bing ;
Du, Minzhe ;
Zhang, Ning .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (06) :6375-6388