Strategic interaction in environmental regulation and sulfur dioxide emissions: Evidence from China

被引:25
作者
Wang, Penghao [1 ]
Lu, Zheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Wuhan 430073, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Sch Econ, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Strategic interaction; Sulfur dioxide emissions; SDM model; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY; POLLUTING FIRMS; POLICY; ENERGY; COMPETITION; GROWTH; HYPOTHESIS; INNOVATION; REDUCTION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162620
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental regulation is the central government's main instrument for pollution control, but its actual implemen-tation effect directly depends on the level of enforcement by local governments. Using panel data of 30 regions in Mainland China from 2004 to 2020 and a spatial Durbin model, we investigated the effects of strategic interaction among local governments in environmental regulation on sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions. We found a "race to the top" behavior in the enforcement of environmental regulation among China's local governments. The enhancement of environmental regulation in a region or in its adjacent regions can significantly reduce SO2 emissions in that region, indicating that joint environmental governance can achieve considerable pollution control effects. Furthermore, influ-ence mechanism analysis shows that the emission reduction effect of environmental regulation is primarily achieved through green innovation and finance. In addition, we found that environmental regulation has a significant negative impact on SO2 emissions in low-energy-consuming regions, but not in high-energy-consuming regions. Our findings indicate that China should continue to implement and deepen the green performance appraisal system for local gov-ernments and improve the efficiency of environmental regulations in high-energy-consuming regions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental regulation and CO2 emissions: Based on strategic interaction of environmental governance
    Zhang, Lu
    Wang, Qiaoyu
    Zhang, Ming
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2021, 45
  • [2] Peer effects of environmental regulation on sulfur dioxide emission intensity: Empirical evidence from China
    Shen, Qiong
    Pan, Yuxi
    Wu, Rui
    Feng, Yanchao
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2023,
  • [3] Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation, Foreign Direct Investment, and Regional Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Evidence from China
    Yang, Xiaodi
    Wang, Di
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [4] The impact of environmental regulation on carbon emissions: Evidence from China
    Ai, Hongshan
    Tan, Xiaoqing
    Zhou, Shengwen
    Zhou, Yuhan
    Xing, Hongye
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2023, 80 : 1067 - 1079
  • [5] Environmental Decentralization, Environmental Regulation and Environmental Pollution: Evidence from China
    Cai, Lingzhi
    Guo, Lei
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2023, 32 (03): : 2053 - 2068
  • [6] The spatial impact of population semi-urbanization on sulfur dioxide emissions: Empirical evidence from China
    Zhang, Zhenhua
    Hua, Chao
    Chen, Xue-Li
    Song, Malin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 375
  • [7] Strategic interaction of environmental regulation and green productivity growth in China: Green innovation or pollution refuge?
    Peng, Xin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 732
  • [8] Sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and government spending on environmental protection in China - Evidence from spatial econometric analysis
    Huang, Jr-Tsung
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 175 : 431 - 441
  • [9] Strategic interaction of environmental regulation and its influencing mechanism: Evidence of spatial effects among Chinese cities
    Wu, Libo
    Yang, Meimin
    Wang, Chujun
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 312
  • [10] Environmental regulation, emissions and productivity: Evidence from Chinese COD-emitting manufacturers
    Wang, Chunhua
    Wu, JunJie
    Zhang, Bing
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 92 : 54 - 73