Strategic interaction in environmental regulation and sulfur dioxide emissions: Evidence from China

被引:27
作者
Wang, Penghao [1 ]
Lu, Zheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Wuhan 430073, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Sch Econ, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Strategic interaction; Sulfur dioxide emissions; SDM model; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY; POLLUTING FIRMS; POLICY; ENERGY; COMPETITION; GROWTH; HYPOTHESIS; INNOVATION; REDUCTION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162620
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental regulation is the central government's main instrument for pollution control, but its actual implemen-tation effect directly depends on the level of enforcement by local governments. Using panel data of 30 regions in Mainland China from 2004 to 2020 and a spatial Durbin model, we investigated the effects of strategic interaction among local governments in environmental regulation on sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions. We found a "race to the top" behavior in the enforcement of environmental regulation among China's local governments. The enhancement of environmental regulation in a region or in its adjacent regions can significantly reduce SO2 emissions in that region, indicating that joint environmental governance can achieve considerable pollution control effects. Furthermore, influ-ence mechanism analysis shows that the emission reduction effect of environmental regulation is primarily achieved through green innovation and finance. In addition, we found that environmental regulation has a significant negative impact on SO2 emissions in low-energy-consuming regions, but not in high-energy-consuming regions. Our findings indicate that China should continue to implement and deepen the green performance appraisal system for local gov-ernments and improve the efficiency of environmental regulations in high-energy-consuming regions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   The Environment and Directed Technical Change [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Aghion, Philippe ;
Bursztyn, Leonardo ;
Hemous, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :131-166
[2]   A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis [J].
Ambec, S ;
Barla, P .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2002, 75 (03) :355-360
[3]   The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve [J].
Andreoni, J ;
Levinson, A .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2001, 80 (02) :269-286
[4]   Fiscal Pressure, Tax Competition and Environmental Pollution [J].
Bai, Junhong ;
Lu, Jiayu ;
Li, Sijia .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 73 (02) :431-447
[5]   Do environmental regulations disproportionately affect small businesses? Evidence from the Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures survey [J].
Becker, Randy A. ;
Pasurka, Carl, Jr. ;
Shadbegian, Ronald J. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 66 (03) :523-538
[6]   The Green Solow model [J].
Brock, William A. ;
Taylor, M. Scott .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2010, 15 (02) :127-153
[7]   Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China [J].
Cai, Xiqian ;
Lu, Yi ;
Wu, Mingqin ;
Yu, Linhui .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 123 :73-85
[8]   Yardstick competition in a federation: Theory and evidence from China [J].
Caldeira, Emilie .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 23 (04) :878-897
[9]   Is it worth reducing GHG emissions? Exploring the effect on the cost of debt financing [J].
Caragnano, Alessandra ;
Mariani, Massimo ;
Pizzutilo, Fabio ;
Zito, Marianna .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 270
[10]   Research on the strategic interaction and convergence of China's environmental public expenditure from the perspective of inequality [J].
Chen, Sai ;
Song, Yan ;
Ding, Yueting ;
Qian, Xiangyan ;
Zhang, Ming .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 145 :19-30