A nomogram to predict the risk of scar pregnancy after caesarean section

被引:2
|
作者
He, Chunna [1 ]
Zheng, Fengque [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Jiajing [1 ]
Chen, Saiqiong [1 ]
Yang, Weiwei [1 ]
Huang, Qinxi [1 ]
Qin, Huayi [1 ]
Wei, Jiahan [1 ]
Li, Jingjing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Affiliated Hosp 4, 1 Liushi Rd, Liuzhou 545005, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Dept Reprod Ctr, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Caesarean section; caesarean scar pregnancy; nomogram; predictive model; high-risk factors; logistic; INTRAOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PLACENTAL IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; DIAGNOSIS; CONTRACEPTION; GUIDELINES; MIGRATION; SITE;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2022.2142767
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to identify the high-risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and establish a nomogram to predict the risk of caesarean scar pregnancy in pregnant women with a history of caesarean section. Among 1273 pregnant women with a history of caesarean section, 70% of the patients (892 patients, training sample) were randomly selected for analysis, and a prediction model was generated. The remaining patients (381 patients, validation sample) were validated for the model. Four high-risk factors for CSP were established, including: parity, number of previous abortions, uterus position, and early vaginal bleeding. The area under the curve of the nomogram for the training set was 0.867 and that for the validation set was 0.881, indicating good performance. Calibration curves for predicting CSP showed good calibrations. Decision curve analyses showed good application prospects for the model. Our results show that our nomogram for predicting CSP risks can be a practical tool to help in the early identification of CSP.Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? The high-risk factors for "caesarean scar pregnancy", An simple nomogram could be constructed to predict the risk of the disease through these high-risk factors. What do the results of this study add? This study can quickly predict whether the patient is a high-risk group for uterine scar pregnancy based on the patient's previous pregnancy, early vaginal bleeding and uterine position. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Caesarean scar pregnancy was secondary Long-term complications after caesarean section that with a high risk of pregnancy. In this study, we established a nomogram based on the number of cases of CSP and a control group with a history of caesarean section delivery at term, The high-risk factors were assigned a certain risk value in the early stage, if the woman contains more high-risk factors, the higher the risk of developing CSP, it should be highly valued in the early stage, and the rate of visiting a doctor should be increased.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pregnancy after Caesarean section: fewer or later?
    Eijsink, J. J. H.
    van der Leeuw-Harmsen, L.
    van der Linden, P. J. Q.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2008, 23 (03) : 543 - 547
  • [22] Clinical value of ultrasonic indicators in predicting the outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy after pregnancy termination
    Fu, Liye
    Yuan, Hongxia
    Cao, Hong
    Zhou, Qichang
    Tan, Xiaotan
    Guo, Jun
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [23] Caesarean section scar pregnancy: expectant management with favourable outcome of an acute presentation
    Rodrigo, Senapathige Nilan Kalidasa
    Gunasekera, Eranda Diyagama
    Dhanaratna, Dhanuka
    BMJ CASE REPORTS, 2025, 18 (03)
  • [24] Nomogram to predict the risk of pancreatitis after first ERCP
    Wu, Kaini
    Zhang, Man
    Fu, Yun-Feng
    Guo, Zi-Xiang
    Qiu, Jian-Hao
    Pan, Ya-Ting
    Zhou, Xiao-Dong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 : 16 - 16
  • [25] Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study
    Gull, B.
    Klerelid, V
    Jormeus, A.
    Strandell, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2021, 2021 (02)
  • [26] Explanatory variables and nomogram of a clinical prediction model to estimate the risk of caesarean section after term induction
    Bademkiran, Muhammed Hanifi
    Bademkiran, Cihan
    Ege, Serhat
    Peker, Nurullah
    Sucu, Seyhun
    Obut, Mehmet
    Demirel, Mehmet Ozgur
    Samanci, Serhat
    Bagli, Ihsan
    Celik, Kiymet
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 41 (03) : 367 - 373
  • [27] A nomogram and risk stratification to predict subsequent pregnancy loss in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss
    Li, Mingyang
    Zhou, Renyi
    Yu, Daier
    Chen, Dan
    Zhao, Aimin
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 (10) : 2221 - 2232
  • [28] Curettage after uterine artery embolization combined with methotrexate treatment for caesarean scar pregnancy
    Feng, Ying
    Chen, Suwen
    Li, Changdong
    Zhang, Xiaofeng
    Duan, Hua
    Sooranna, Suren
    Johnson, Mark R.
    Li, Jian
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 12 (03) : 1469 - 1475
  • [29] Caesarean scar pregnancy in the UK: a national cohort study
    Harb, H. M.
    Knight, M.
    Bottomley, C.
    Overton, C.
    Tobias, A.
    Gallos, I. D.
    Shehmar, M.
    Farquharson, R.
    Horne, A.
    Latthe, P.
    Edi-Osagie, E.
    MacLean, M.
    Marston, E.
    Zamora, J.
    Dawood, F.
    Small, R.
    Ross, J.
    Bourne, T.
    Coomarasamy, A.
    Jurkovic, D.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (13) : 1663 - 1670
  • [30] Caesarean scar pregnancy presenting as anaemia
    Dandawate, B.
    Carpenter, T.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 29 (08) : 772 - 773