Transition from waste management to circular economy: the European Union roadmap

被引:81
作者
Chioatto, Elisa [1 ]
Sospiro, Paolo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ferrara, Dept Econ & Management, V Voltapaletto 11, I-44121 Ferrara, Italy
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Engn, VS Marta 3, I-50139 Florence, Italy
关键词
Municipal waste management; EU comparative analysis; Secondary raw materials; Resource efficiency; Circular economy; Circular material use;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-021-02050-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the last twenty years, the European Union (EU) has enhanced Waste Management (WM) strategies toward Circular Economy (CE). Starting from the previous analysis carried out by Fabrizi and Sospiro (Waste Management in Europe: A Comparative Study of the main EU countries: Methodology and Evaluation of Local Waste Management System, Lambert Publisher, Saarbucken, Germany, 2017), this article analyses firstly EU Member States (MSs) Roadmap toward Sustainable Waste Management (SWM) and secondly to CE. The research relied on Kirchherr et al. (Kirchherr in Ecological Economics 150:264-272, 2018) study which identified four barriers to CE (cultural, regulatory, market failure, and technological). The regulatory framework has been analysed. Four case studies (France, FR, Germany, DE, Italy, IT, the Netherlands, NL) have been selected to investigate: criteria, methodologies, policies, implementation and outcomes on SWM at national level. In addition, given MSs coordination at EU level the research aimed at analysing whether is there any convergence in terms of policies and achievements. The study considered recent findings on CE, Eurostat data, and Eurostat Circular Material Use (CMU) indicator. The analysis revealed SWM positive results, which seem to confirm a certain degree of convergence between EU-MSs that consists in a positive cascade mechanism from advanced toward less advanced MSs. In spite of this, EU countries need a further step in order to close materials' loops. Larger quantity of Secondary Raw Materials (SRMs) should return to manufacture, and this requires stronger intervention that goes beyond the waste sector. In light of this, the EU Commission recently entrusted the Joint Research Centre (JRC) to assess and compare the environmental impacts of alternative feedstock for plastic products. This reveals EU attempt to re-balance the intervention on CE, by striving new products' design approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 276
页数:28
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Effects of environmental regulation on separate waste collection dynamics: empirical evidence from Italy
    Agovino, Massimiliano
    Garofalo, Antonio
    Mariani, Angela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 124 : 30 - 40
  • [2] Ambiente Italia Work Group, 2008, EX SUMM TAK EC REC E
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, Municipal Waste Management Across European Countries
  • [4] Bilitewsky B., 2017, 40 YEARS SOURCE SEPA, P5
  • [5] Bourguignon Didier, 2014, BRIEF TURN WAST RES
  • [6] Buclet N., 2000, MUNICIPAL WASTE MANA
  • [7] Performance and convergence in municipal waste treatment in the European Union
    Castillo-Gimenez, Juana
    Montanes, Antonio
    Picazo-Tadeo, Andres J.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 85 : 222 - 231
  • [8] Eco-design and Eco-materials: An interactive and collaborative approach
    Cicconi, Paolo
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 23
  • [9] From linear to circular integrated waste management systems: A review of methodological approaches
    Cobo, Selene
    Dominguez-Ramos, Antonio
    Irabien, Angel
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 135 : 279 - 295
  • [10] Cox M., 2008, COMBUSTION RESIDUES, DOI [10.1002/9780470094440, DOI 10.1002/9780470094440]