Engineering Judgment and Education: An Arendtian Account

被引:0
作者
Palmas, Karl [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Div Sci Technol & Soc, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Engineering judgment; engineering education; Hannah Arendt; cognitivism; humanities; liberal arts; critical thinking; CRITICAL THINKING; LIBERAL-ARTS; ARENDT; HANNAH; MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGE; THOUGHT;
D O I
10.1080/19378629.2024.2333239
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article discusses the meaning of judgment in engineering and engineering education, and it does so by introducing the work of political thinker Hannah Arendt. The argument presents Arendt's non-cognitivist account of judgment as a counterpoint to prevailing conceptions of engineering judgment. Moreover, it suggests that Arendt's unique perspective on what it means to be human in the context of modern technoscience is relevant to the discussion on the place of the humanities and liberal arts in engineering education.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 205
页数:22
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, 2022, CRIT ACCR ENG PROGR
[2]  
Adorno TheodorWiesengrund., 1981, PRISMS
[3]   A literature review of critical thinking in engineering education [J].
Ahern, Aoife ;
Dominguez, Caroline ;
McNally, Ciaran ;
O'Sullivan, John J. ;
Pedrosa, Daniela .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (05) :816-828
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Designing Engineers
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1977, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays
[6]  
Arendt H., 2006, FUTURE
[7]  
Arendt H., 1958, The Human Condition
[8]  
Arendt H., 1978, The life of the mind: Thinking
[9]  
Arendt Hannah., 1978, LIFE MIND
[10]  
Arendt Hannah., 1951, Origins of Totalitarianism