Performance Analysis of Meta-Heuristic Algorithms for Optimal PI Tuning of PFC

被引:3
作者
Mamizadeh, Ali [1 ]
Genc, Naci [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Electrotech Engn, R&D Dept, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Khoja Akhmet Yassawi Int Kazakh Turkish Univ, Elect Engn Dept, Turkestan, Kazakhstan
[3] Yalova Univ, Engn Fac, Elect & Elect Engn Dept, Yalova, Turkiye
关键词
power factor correction; cuckoo optimization algorithm; genetic algorithm; meta-heuristics optimization algorithms; THD; CONTROLLER; VOLTAGE;
D O I
10.1080/15325008.2023.2291800
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The popularity of the average current mode (ACM) controlled boost type power factor correction (PFC) topologies is increasing due to their suitability for power quality problems. Proportional-Integral (PI) controller method is generally used in ACM controlled boost PFC circuits which include two controllers. However, the most important complexity of ACM controlled PFC circuits is tuning the coefficients of the PI controllers optimally. Therefore, this paper proposes the optimal tuning of PI coefficients used in ACM controlled boost PFC circuits using different meta-heuristics algorithms. First, the proposed ACM controller-based boost PFC topology is analyzed in MATLAB/Simulink software by using variable loads. Then the simulation results of the Cuckoo Optimization Algorithm (COA) based ACM controlled boost PFC converter are compared with the results determined via Ziegler-Nichols (ZN), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Imperialistic Competitive Algorithm (ICA), and Invasive Weed Optimization (IWO). Finally, the experimental verification of the topology has been done using a 600 W prototype and eZdsp F28335. As COA showed better results among other evolutionary algorithms used in this paper, we used COA parameters to observe the performance of the proposed tuning method. The experimental studies have been done under different load variations similar to the simulation studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1053
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]  
Lai YS, 2012, 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY (ICIT), P626, DOI 10.1109/ICIT.2012.6210008
[22]  
Mamizadeh A, 2018, INT CONF RENEW ENERG, P677, DOI 10.1109/ICRERA.2018.8566883
[23]  
Marsala G, 2018, IN C IND ENG ENG MAN, P1687, DOI 10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607590
[24]  
Nangru D, 2013, 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION, ROBOTICS AND EMBEDDED SYSTEMS (CARE-2013)
[25]   Cuckoo Optimization Algorithm [J].
Rajabioun, Ramin .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2011, 11 (08) :5508-5518
[26]   Major Challenges towards Energy Management and Power Sharing in a Hybrid AC/DC Microgrid: A Review [J].
Sarwar, Sohail ;
Kirli, Desen ;
Merlin, Michael M. C. ;
Kiprakis, Aristides E. .
ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (23)
[27]  
Shadkam E., 2015, ARXIV
[28]   Priority-based Energy Management Technique for Integration of Solar PV, Battery, and Fuel Cell Systems in an Autonomous DC Microgrid [J].
Shamshuddin, Mohammed Azharuddin ;
Babu, Thanikanti Sudhakar ;
Dragicevic, Tomislav ;
Miyatake, Masafumi ;
Rajasekar, Natarajan .
ELECTRIC POWER COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS, 2017, 45 (17) :1881-1891
[29]   An Integrated Energy Control System to Provide Optimum Demand Side Management of a Grid-Interactive Microgrid [J].
Tepe, Izviye Fatimanur ;
Irmak, Erdal .
ELECTRIC POWER COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS, 2023, 51 (06) :619-638
[30]  
Xing B., 2014, Innovative computational intelligence: A rough guide to 134 clever algorithms p, P177, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03404-1_13