Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Rectal Cancer Compared with Open and Laparoscopic Surgery

被引:42
作者
Khajeh, Elias [1 ,2 ]
Aminizadeh, Ehsan [1 ]
Moghadam, Arash Dooghaie [1 ]
Nikbakhsh, Rajan [1 ]
Goncalves, Gil [2 ]
Carvalho, Carlos [3 ]
Parvaiz, Amjad [2 ]
Kulu, Yakup [1 ]
Mehrabi, Arianeb [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplantat Surg, D-69121 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Champalimaud Fdn, Dept Surg, Digest Unit, P-1400038 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Champalimaud Fdn, Dept Oncol, Digest Unit, P-1400038 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
rectal cancer; total mesorectal excision; rectal resection; costs; laparoscopic surgery; robotic surgery; systematic review; meta-analysis; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; OPEN RESECTION; OPEN-LABEL; METAANALYSIS; CONVERSION; QUALITY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15030839
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Surgery is the mainstay treatment for patients with rectal cancer. Open and laparoscopic surgeries have been used for many years, but robot-assisted surgery has been recently developed and is expanding rapidly. We compared the results of robotic rectal surgery with open and laparoscopic methods. We found that robotic surgery has better outcomes than open surgery in bleeding, infection, hospital stay, and complete tumor resection. Similarly, robotic surgery did better than the laparoscopic approach in bleeding, need for reoperation, and complete tumor resection. Robotic surgery, however, incurred longer operation times and higher costs than open and laparoscopic surgery did. With increasing trends for the adoption of robotic surgery, many centers are considering changing their practices from open or laparoscopic to robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer. We compared the outcomes of robot-assisted rectal resection with those of open and laparoscopic surgery. We searched Medline, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases until October 2022. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies comparing robotic surgery with open or laparoscopic rectal resection were included. Fifteen RCTs and 11 prospective studies involving 6922 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that robotic surgery has lower blood loss, less surgical site infection, shorter hospital stays, and higher negative resection margins than open resection. Robotic surgery also has lower conversion rates, lower blood loss, lower rates of reoperation, and higher negative circumferential margins than laparoscopic surgery. Robotic surgery had longer operation times and higher costs than open and laparoscopic surgery. There were no differences in other complications, mortality, and survival between robotic surgery and the open or laparoscopic approach. However, heterogeneity between studies was moderate to high in some analyses. The robotic approach can be the method of choice for centers planning to change from open to minimally invasive rectal surgery. The higher costs of robotic surgery should be considered as a substitute for laparoscopic surgery (PROSPERO: CRD42022381468).
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal tumour surgery: a cohort study [J].
Asklid, D. ;
Gerjy, R. ;
Hjern, F. ;
Pekkari, K. ;
Gustafsson, U. O. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 21 (02) :191-199
[2]  
Atkins D, 2004, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V328, P1490
[3]   Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excison of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial [J].
Baik, S. H. ;
Ko, Y. T. ;
Kang, C. M. ;
Lee, W. J. ;
Kim, N. K. ;
Sohn, S. K. ;
Chi, H. S. ;
Cho, C. H. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (07) :1601-1608
[4]  
Basilico V, 2014, MINERVA CHIR, V69, P245
[5]   The Learning Curve for the Laparoscopic Approach to Conservative Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer Lessons Drawn From a Single Institution's Experience [J].
Bege, Thierry ;
Lelong, Bernard ;
Esterni, Benjamin ;
Turrini, Olivier ;
Guiramand, Jerome ;
Francon, Daniel ;
Mokart, Djamel ;
Houvenaeghel, Gilles ;
Giovannini, Marc ;
Delpero, Jean Robert .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 251 (02) :249-253
[6]   Assessing appropriateness for elective colorectal cancer surgery: clinical, oncological, and quality-of-life short-term outcomes employing different treatment approaches [J].
Bertani, Emilio ;
Chiappa, Antonio ;
Biffi, Roberto ;
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro ;
Radice, Davide ;
Branchi, Vittorio ;
Cenderelli, Elena ;
Vetrano, Irene ;
Cenciarelli, Sabine ;
Andreoni, Bruno .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 26 (10) :1317-1327
[7]   Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes [J].
Bianchi, P. P. ;
Ceriani, C. ;
Locatelli, A. ;
Spinoglio, G. ;
Zampino, M. G. ;
Sonzogni, A. ;
Crosta, C. ;
Andreoni, B. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (11) :2888-2894
[8]   The future of robotic surgery How robotics could help shape the future of surgical care [J].
Brodie, Andrew ;
Vasdev, Nikhil .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2018, 100 :4-+
[9]   A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery [J].
Clancy, C. ;
O'Leary, D. P. ;
Burke, J. P. ;
Redmond, H. P. ;
Coffey, J. C. ;
Kerin, M. J. ;
Myers, E. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (06) :482-490
[10]   Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for rectal cancer: medium-term comparative outcomes from a multicenter study [J].
Corbellini, Carlo ;
Biffi, Roberto ;
Luca, Fabrizio ;
Chiappa, Antonio ;
Costa, Stefano ;
Bertani, Emilio ;
Bona, Stefano ;
Lombardi, Davide ;
Tamayo, Darina ;
Botteri, Edoardo ;
Andreoni, Bruno .
TUMORI JOURNAL, 2016, 102 (04) :414-421