Nomograms referenced by cardiac magnetic resonance in the prediction of cardiac injuries in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

被引:4
|
作者
Zhao, Chen-xu [1 ]
Wei, Lai [1 ]
Dong, Jian-xun [1 ]
He, Jie [1 ]
Kong, Ling-cong [1 ]
Ding, Song [1 ]
Ge, Heng [1 ,2 ]
Pu, Jun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Renji Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Renji Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ST-elevation myocardial infarction; Nomogram; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Cardiac injury; MICROVASCULAR OBSTRUCTION; RISK-FACTORS; ASSOCIATION; PARADOX; SIZE; HYPERGLYCEMIA; REPERFUSION; MORTALITY; INSIGHTS; DISEASES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.05.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Evaluation of cardiac injuries is essential in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has become the gold standard for quantifying cardiac injuries; however, its routine application is limited. A nomogram is a useful tool for prognostic prediction based on the comprehensive utilization of clinical data. We presumed that the nomogram models established using CMR as a reference could precisely predict cardiac injuries. Methods: This analysis included 584 patients with acute STEMI from a CMR registry study for STEMI (NCT03768453). The patients were divided into training (n = 408) and testing (n = 176) datasets. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method and multivariate logistic regression were used to construct nomograms for predicting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) & LE;40%, infarction size (IS) & GE; 20% on the LV mass, and microvascular dysfunction. Results: The nomogram for predicting LVEF & LE;40%, IS & GE;20%, and microvascular dysfunction comprised 14, 10, and 15 predictors, respectively. With the nomograms, the individual risk probability of developing specific outcomes could be calculated, and the weight of each risk factor was demonstrated. The C-index of the nomograms in the training dataset were 0.901, 0.831, and 0.814, respectively, and were comparable in the testing set, showing good nomogram discrimination and calibration. The decision curve analysis demonstrated good clinical effectiveness. Online calculators were also constructed. Conclusions: With the CMR results as the reference standard, the established nomograms demonstrated good effectiveness in predicting cardiac injuries after STEMI and could provide physicians with a new option for individual risk stratification.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 79
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fibroblast activation protein imaging in reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Boqia Xie
    Jiaxin Wang
    Xiao-Ying Xi
    Xiaojuan Guo
    Bi-Xi Chen
    Lina Li
    Cuncun Hua
    Shihua Zhao
    Pixiong Su
    Mulei Chen
    Min-Fu Yang
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2022, 49 : 2786 - 2797
  • [32] Thrombosis and Prognosis Following ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Left Ventricular Thrombus Assessment by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
    Kim, Jiwon
    Weinsaft, Jonathan W.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2015, 8 (10)
  • [33] Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking global and segmental strain in acute and chronic ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Jennifer Erley
    Jitka Starekova
    Martin Sinn
    Kai Muellerleile
    Hang Chen
    Phillip Harms
    Lieda Naimi
    Mathias Meyer
    Ersin Cavus
    Jan Schneider
    Stefan Blankenberg
    Gunnar K. Lund
    Gerhard Adam
    Enver Tahir
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [34] Correlation of Electrocardiogram and Regional Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Literature Review
    Rinta-Kiikka, Irina
    Tuohinen, Suvi
    Ryymin, Pertti
    Kosonen, Petteri
    Huhtala, Heini
    Gorgels, Anton
    Bayes de Luna, Antonio
    Nikus, Kjell
    ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2014, 19 (06) : 509 - 523
  • [35] Intravenous Morphine Administration in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction - Impact on Reperfusion Success Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    de Waha, Suzanne
    Eitel, Ingo
    Desch, Steffen
    Fuernau, Georg
    Lurz, Philipp
    Schuler, Gerhard
    Thiele, Holger
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (21)
  • [36] Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is a Useful Diagnostic Adjunct in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Without a Culprit Coronary Artery
    Stark, Madeline
    Lesser, John R.
    Sharkey, Scott W.
    Solie, Christopher J.
    Unger, Barbara T.
    Longe, Terrence F.
    Larson, David M.
    Henry, Timothy D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (10) : A282 - A282
  • [37] The Systematic Evaluation of Identifying the Infarct Related Artery Utilizing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients Presenting with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Hamo, Carine E.
    Klem, Igor
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Songco, Vincent
    Najjar, Samer
    Lakatta, Edward G.
    Raman, Subha V.
    Harrington, Robert A.
    Heitner, John F.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [38] Prognosis after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a study on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus clinical routine
    de Waha, Suzanne
    Eitel, Ingo
    Desch, Steffen
    Fuernau, Georg
    Lurz, Philipp
    Stiermaier, Thomas
    Blazek, Stephan
    Schuler, Gerhard
    Thiele, Holger
    TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [39] MYOCARDITIS WITH ST ELEVATION AND ELEVATED CARDIAC ENZYMES MISDIAGNOSED AS AN ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    Sheldon, Seth H.
    Crandall, Mark A.
    Jaffe, Allan S.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 43 (06): : 996 - 999
  • [40] Fibroblast activation protein imaging in reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Xie, Boqia
    Wang, Jiaxin
    Xiao-Ying Xi
    Guo, Xiaojuan
    Bi-Xi Chen
    Li, Lina
    Hua, Cuncun
    Zhao, Shihua
    Su, Pixiong
    Chen, Mulei
    Min-Fu Yang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (08) : 2786 - 2797