The development and validation of a scale on L2 writing teacher feedback literacy

被引:10
作者
Lee, Icy [1 ]
Karaca, Mehmet [2 ]
Inan, Serhat [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Res Teacher Educ & Mat Dev R TEAM Grp, Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Hacettepe Univ, Div Curriculum & Instruct, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Feedback; Feedback literacy; L2; writing; Writing teachers; Scale development; WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK; BELIEFS; ACCURACY; PERCEPTIONS; ENGAGEMENT; WRITERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.asw.2023.100743
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Feedback literate teachers play a central role in promoting students' writing performance. In L2 writing, however, there is a paucity of research on teacher feedback literacy, and instruments that investigate L2 writing teacher feedback literacy are virtually non-existent. Heeding the call for research on scale development to measure teacher feedback literacy, this two-phase study is an attempt to develop and validate a feedback literacy scale (FLS) for teachers to illuminate this budding concept in L2 writing. The factor structure of the 34-item FLS was determined through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with the participation of 223 writing teachers. The results revealed a three-factor solution, namely Perceived Knowledge, Values, and Perceived Skills. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed which aimed to verify the structure of the scale and its three sub-scales, based on a sample of another 208 writing teachers. It was found that the model fits the data well (e.g., the RMSEA with 0.052 (90 % CI=0.045-0.059)), proving that the FLS yields psychometrically reliable and valid results, and it is a robust scale to measure the self -reported feedback literacy of L2 writing teachers. In light of these findings, the factor structure and sub-scales of the FLS are discussed. Practical implications for teachers, teacher trainers and teacher education programs, as well as implications for feedback literacy research are provided.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Researching feedback dialogue: an interactional analysis approach [J].
Ajjawi, Rola ;
Boud, David .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (02) :252-265
[2]   TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN FACTOR ANALYSIS [J].
Bartlett, M. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-STATISTICAL SECTION, 1950, 3 :77-85
[3]   Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2010, 19 (04) :207-217
[4]   The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
ELT JOURNAL, 2009, 63 (03) :204-211
[5]   What feedback literate teachers do: an empirically-derived competency framework [J].
Boud, David ;
Dawson, Phillip .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 48 (02) :158-171
[6]   Differing perceptions in the feedback process [J].
Carless, D .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 31 (02) :219-233
[7]   Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy [J].
Carless, David ;
Winstone, Naomi .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 28 (01) :150-163
[8]   The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback [J].
Carless, David ;
Boud, David .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (08) :1315-1325
[9]  
Casanave C.P., 2004, Controversies in second language writing
[10]   SCREE TEST FOR NUMBER OF FACTORS [J].
CATTELL, RB .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1966, 1 (02) :245-276