Coupling input feature construction methods and machine learning algorithms for hourly secondary supply temperature prediction

被引:3
作者
Ling, Jihong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Bingyang [1 ]
Dai, Na [1 ]
Xing, Jincheng [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin Key Lab Indoor Air Environm Qual Control, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ, Tianjin Key Lab Built Environm & Energy Applicat, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
关键词
Secondary supply temperature prediction; Input feature construction; Prediction algorithms; Categorical principal component analysis; COOLING-LOAD PREDICTION; HEATING LOAD; NEURAL-NETWORK; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; SELECTION; MODEL; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.127459
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Accurate supply temperature prediction plays a vital role in achieving meticulous management of heating sta-tion. However, there are relatively few studies on ultra-short-term supply temperature prediction at present. This paper comprehensively applied 4 feature selection methods and 3 prediction algorithms to estimate hourly secondary supply temperature. Taking a floor radiant heating system as the case, the correlation analysis (CA) based on the back propagation neural network (BPNN) model and the support vector regression (SVR) model shows that outdoor temperature, supply and return temperatures are the main input feature categories. This paper novelty proposed the categorical principal component analysis (CPCA) method, compared with the traditional principal component analysis (PCA), this method can reduce the root mean square error (RMSE) of BPNN model and SVR model by an average of 18.6% and 19.7%, respectively. The comparison of 4 historical input lengths for the long and short-term memory (LSTM) model shows that historical 12 h can fully consider the influence of building thermal inertia and heating system thermal delay for floor radiant. Further comprehensive comparison shows that the BPNN model based on correlation analysis has the best performance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   An optimized model using LSTM network for demand forecasting [J].
Abbasimehr, Hossein ;
Shabani, Mostafa ;
Yousefi, Mohsen .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 143
[2]  
[Anonymous], Baltimore Education Research Consortium BERC
[3]   Modeling heating and cooling loads by artificial intelligence for energy-efficient building design [J].
Chou, Jui-Sheng ;
Bui, Dac-Khuong .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 82 :437-446
[4]   District heater load forecasting based on machine learning and parallel CNN-LSTM attention [J].
Chung, Won Hee ;
Gu, Yeong Hyeon ;
Yoo, Seong Joon .
ENERGY, 2022, 246
[5]   Forecasting diurnal cooling energy load for institutional buildings using Artificial Neural Networks [J].
Deb, Chirag ;
Eang, Lee Siew ;
Yang, Junjing ;
Santamouris, Mattheos .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 121 :284-297
[6]   Model input selection for building heating load prediction: A case study for an office building in Tianjin [J].
Ding, Yan ;
Zhang, Qiang ;
Yuan, Tianhao ;
Yang, Kun .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 159 :254-270
[7]   Effect of input variables on cooling load prediction accuracy of an office building [J].
Ding, Yan ;
Zhang, Qiang ;
Yuan, Tianhao ;
Yang, Fan .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 128 :225-234
[8]   Applying support vector machines to predict building energy consumption in tropical region [J].
Dong, B ;
Cao, C ;
Lee, SE .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2005, 37 (05) :545-553
[9]   A short-term building cooling load prediction method using deep learning algorithms [J].
Fan, Cheng ;
Xiao, Fu ;
Zhao, Yang .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 195 :222-233
[10]   Inverse blackbox modeling of the heating and cooling load in office buildings [J].
Gunay, Burak ;
Shen, Weiming ;
Newsham, Guy .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 142 :200-210