Efficient model-correction-based reliability analysis of uncertain dynamical systems

被引:3
作者
Hirzinger, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Nackenhorst, Udo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Int Res Training Grp IRTG 2657, Appelstrasse 11-11a, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[2] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Mech & Computat Mech, Appelstrasse 9, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
关键词
STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY; MOVING PARTICLES;
D O I
10.1007/s00707-023-03499-1
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The scope of this paper is to apply a model-correction-based strategy for efficient reliability analysis of uncertain dynamical systems based on a low-fidelity (LF) model whose outcomes are corrected in a probabilistic sense to represent the more realistic outcomes of a high-fidelity (HF) model. In the model-correction approach utilized, the LF model is calibrated to the HF model close to the so-called most probable point in standard normal space, which allows a more realistic assessment of the considered complex dynamical system. Since only few expensive limit state function evaluations of the HF model are required, an efficient reliability analysis is enabled. In an application example, the LF model describes an existing single-span railway bridge modelled as simply supported Euler-Bernoulli beam subjected to moving single forces representing the axle loads of a moving train. The HF modelling approach accounts for the bridge-train interaction by modelling the passing train as mass-spring-damper system, however increasing the computational effort of the limit state function evaluations. Failure probabilities evaluated with the model-correction approach are contrasted and discussed with failure probabilities of the sophisticated bridge-train interaction model evaluated with the first-order reliability method (FORM). It is demonstrated that the efficiency of the method depends on the correlation between the LF and the HF model. A comparison of the results of FORM and the model-correction-based approach shows that the latter provides reliable failure probability prediction of the HF model while leading to a significant reduction in computational effort.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1436
页数:18
相关论文
共 54 条
[11]  
Clough R. W., 1975, Dynamics of Structures
[12]   Multiple design points in first and second-order reliability [J].
Der Kiureghian, A ;
Dakessian, T .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 1998, 20 (01) :37-49
[13]   Active learning with multifidelity modeling for efficient rare event simulation [J].
Dhulipala, Somayajulu L. N. ;
Shields, Michael D. ;
Spencer, Benjamin W. ;
Bolisetti, Chandrakanth ;
Slaughter, Andrew E. ;
Laboure, Vincent M. ;
Chakroborty, Promit .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2022, 468
[14]  
Dimitrov D., 2009, 17 INT C COMP MAT IC
[15]   MODEL-CORRECTION-FACTOR METHOD IN STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY [J].
DITLEVSEN, O ;
ARNBJERGNIELSEN, T .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1994, 120 (01) :1-10
[16]   Issues in Deciding Whether to Use Multifidelity Surrogates [J].
Fernandez-Godino, M. Giselle ;
Park, Chanyoung ;
Kim, Nam H. ;
Haftka, Raphael T. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2019, 57 (05) :2039-2054
[17]   Model correction factor method for reliability problems involving integrals of non-Gaussian random fields [J].
Franchin, P ;
Ditlevsen, O ;
Kiureghian, AD .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2002, 17 (02) :109-122
[18]   Simulation and Estimation of Extreme Quantiles and Extreme Probabilities [J].
Guyader, Arnaud ;
Hengartner, Nicolas ;
Matzner-Lober, Eric .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 64 (02) :171-196
[19]   VECTOR PROCESS OUT-CROSSING AS PARALLEL SYSTEM SENSITIVITY MEASURE [J].
HAGEN, O ;
TVEDT, L .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1991, 117 (10) :2201-2220
[20]  
HASOFER AM, 1974, J ENG MECH DIV-ASCE, V100, P111