Conservation decision makers worry about relevancy and funding but not climate change

被引:2
|
作者
Jewell, Kathryn [1 ,6 ]
Peterson, M. Nils [1 ]
Martin, Mallory [2 ]
Stevenson, Kathryn T. [3 ]
Terando, Adam [4 ,5 ]
Teseneer, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] State Univ, Dept Forestry & Envrionmental Resources, 2820 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] US Fish & Wildlife Serv Sci Applicat, 1751 Vars Dr, Raleigh, NC 27699 USA
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Pk Recreat & Tourism Management, 2820 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, US Geol Survey, Southeast Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, Campus Box 7617, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[5] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Appl Ecol, 2820 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[6] North Carolina State Univ, 2820 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2023年 / 47卷 / 02期
关键词
climate change; conservation leadership; management; planning; wildlife agencies; WILDLIFE CONSERVATION; HUNTER RECRUITMENT; BIODIVERSITY; PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM; TRANSFORMATION; COMMUNICATION; BENEFICIARIES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.1424
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Stakeholders fundamentally shape the success of wildlife management, yet little is known about how one of the most important stakeholder groups, wildlife agency decision makers, view emerging conservation challenges. Wildlife agency decision makers collectively shape how wildlife conservation unfolds in North America, but their perspectives are generally absent in the literature. Challenges including climate change, conservation funding models, and wildlife disease make understanding how wildlife decision makers view the future of wildlife conservation essential. We interviewed 48 directors and supervisory board members of wildlife agencies in the southeast United States from July 2019 to January 2020 to gauge their assessment of future conservation challenges and preferred response strategies. Declining agency relevancy and insufficient funding were the 2 most commonly identified challenges, while climate change was rarely mentioned as an issue because decision makers believed it was a relatively slow-moving background condition. Decision makers described improving relevance through education and outreach as their primary response to conservation challenges. Our results suggest that climate change-informed wildlife management may benefit from a 2-pronged approach. First, we suggest decision makers should be informed about the challenges posed by climate change, and second, existing efforts to promote diversity among constituents should include engaging groups who support tackling the threat climate change poses to wildlife conservation. Increasing the priority given to climate change adaptation efforts in wildlife agencies will likely require future research to discern which approaches can most improve the perceived salience of climate change to decision makers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics
    Hodgson, Jenny A.
    Thomas, Chris D.
    Wintle, Brendan A.
    Moilanen, Atte
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2009, 46 (05) : 964 - 969
  • [32] Inconsistency between international nature conservation law and adaptation of biodiversity to climate change
    Zia-ud-Din, Malik
    Eddaran, Driss
    Al Ajlani, Riad
    Elhajraoui, Fatima Ezzohra
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE AND BIODIVERSITY, 2023, 7 (04) : 17 - 35
  • [33] A Review of Climate-Change Adaptation Strategies for Wildlife Management and Biodiversity Conservation
    Mawdsley, Jonathan R.
    O'Malley, Robin
    Ojima, Dennis S.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (05) : 1080 - 1089
  • [34] Managing Forests for Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Change Mitigation
    Azuero-Pedraza, Cindy G.
    Lauri, Pekka
    Augustynczik, Andrey Lessa Derci
    Thomas, Valerie M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (21) : 9175 - 9186
  • [35] Integrating Climate and Ocean Change Vulnerability into Conservation Planning
    McLeod, Elizabeth
    Green, Alison
    Game, Edward
    Anthony, Kenneth
    Cinner, Joshua
    Heron, Scott F.
    Kleypas, Joanie
    Lovelock, Catherine E.
    Pandolfi, John M.
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Salm, Rodney
    Schill, Steve
    Woodroffe, Colin
    COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 40 (06) : 651 - 672
  • [36] Farmers' intention and decision to adapt to climate change: A case study in the Yom and Nan basins, Phichit province of Thailand
    Arunrat, Noppol
    Wang, Can
    Pumijumnong, Nathsuda
    Sereenonchai, Sukanya
    Cai, Wenjia
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 : 672 - 685
  • [37] CLIMATE CHANGE CHALLENGES FOR LAND CONSERVATION: RETHINKING CONSERVATION EASEMENTS, STRATEGIES, AND TOOLS
    Owley, Jessica
    Cheever, Federico
    Rissman, Adena R.
    Shaw, M. Rebecca
    Thompson, Barton H., Jr.
    Weeks, W. William
    DENVER LAW REVIEW, 2018, 95 (03): : 727 - 779
  • [38] Ocean conservation boosts climate change mitigation and adaptation
    Jacquemont, Juliette
    Blasiak, Robert
    Le Cam, Chloe
    Le Gouellec, Mael
    Claudet, Joachim
    ONE EARTH, 2022, 5 (10): : 1126 - 1138
  • [39] The landscape of climate change adaptation aspirations in the US non-profit conservation sector
    Skikne, Sarah
    Cross, Molly
    Press, Daniel
    Zavaleta, Erika
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 3 (12)
  • [40] Impacts of cacao agroforestry systems on climate change, soil conservation, and water resources: a review
    Francois, Mathurin
    Pontes, Maria Carolina Goncalves
    da Silva, Arthur Lima
    Mariano-Neto, Eduardo
    WATER POLICY, 2023, 25 (06) : 564 - 581