Conservation decision makers worry about relevancy and funding but not climate change

被引:2
|
作者
Jewell, Kathryn [1 ,6 ]
Peterson, M. Nils [1 ]
Martin, Mallory [2 ]
Stevenson, Kathryn T. [3 ]
Terando, Adam [4 ,5 ]
Teseneer, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] State Univ, Dept Forestry & Envrionmental Resources, 2820 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] US Fish & Wildlife Serv Sci Applicat, 1751 Vars Dr, Raleigh, NC 27699 USA
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Pk Recreat & Tourism Management, 2820 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, US Geol Survey, Southeast Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, Campus Box 7617, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[5] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Appl Ecol, 2820 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[6] North Carolina State Univ, 2820 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2023年 / 47卷 / 02期
关键词
climate change; conservation leadership; management; planning; wildlife agencies; WILDLIFE CONSERVATION; HUNTER RECRUITMENT; BIODIVERSITY; PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM; TRANSFORMATION; COMMUNICATION; BENEFICIARIES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.1424
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Stakeholders fundamentally shape the success of wildlife management, yet little is known about how one of the most important stakeholder groups, wildlife agency decision makers, view emerging conservation challenges. Wildlife agency decision makers collectively shape how wildlife conservation unfolds in North America, but their perspectives are generally absent in the literature. Challenges including climate change, conservation funding models, and wildlife disease make understanding how wildlife decision makers view the future of wildlife conservation essential. We interviewed 48 directors and supervisory board members of wildlife agencies in the southeast United States from July 2019 to January 2020 to gauge their assessment of future conservation challenges and preferred response strategies. Declining agency relevancy and insufficient funding were the 2 most commonly identified challenges, while climate change was rarely mentioned as an issue because decision makers believed it was a relatively slow-moving background condition. Decision makers described improving relevance through education and outreach as their primary response to conservation challenges. Our results suggest that climate change-informed wildlife management may benefit from a 2-pronged approach. First, we suggest decision makers should be informed about the challenges posed by climate change, and second, existing efforts to promote diversity among constituents should include engaging groups who support tackling the threat climate change poses to wildlife conservation. Increasing the priority given to climate change adaptation efforts in wildlife agencies will likely require future research to discern which approaches can most improve the perceived salience of climate change to decision makers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Challenges in assessing the vulnerability of species, to climate change to inform conservation actions
    Butt, N.
    Possingham, H. P.
    De Los Rios, C.
    Maggini, R.
    Fuller, R. A.
    Maxwell, S. L.
    Watson, J. E. M.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2016, 199 : 10 - 15
  • [22] Biodiversity conservation in the context of climate change: Facing challenges and management strategies
    Wang, Zhirong
    Wang, Tongxin
    Zhang, Xiujuan
    Wang, Junbang
    Yang, Yongsheng
    Sun, Yu
    Guo, Xiaohua
    Wu, Qinghua
    Nepovimova, Eugenie
    Watson, Alan E.
    Kuca, Kamil
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 937
  • [23] Conservation strategies in response to rapid climate change: Australia as a case study
    Lindenmayer, David B.
    Steffen, Will
    Burbidge, Andrew A.
    Hughes, Lesley
    Kitching, Roger L.
    Musgrave, Warren
    Smith, Mark Stafford
    Werner, Patricia A.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (07) : 1587 - 1593
  • [24] Portfolio conservation of metapopulations under climate change
    Anderson, Sean C.
    Moore, Jonathan W.
    McClure, Michelle M.
    Dulvy, Nicholas K.
    Cooper, Andrew B.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2015, 25 (02) : 559 - 572
  • [25] 30x30 for Climate: The History and Future of Climate Change-Integrated Conservation Strategies
    Hannah, L.
    Midgley, G. F.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2023, 48 : 1 - 24
  • [26] Whose responsibility? Swedish local decision makers and the scale of climate change abatement
    Lundqvist, Lennart J.
    von Borgstede, Chris
    URBAN AFFAIRS REVIEW, 2008, 43 (03) : 299 - 324
  • [27] Bridging the gap between climate scientists and decision makers
    Griggs, D. J.
    Kestin, T. S.
    CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2011, 47 (1-2) : 139 - 144
  • [28] Are European decision-makers preparing for high-end climate change?
    Lourenco, Tiago Capela
    Cruz, Maria Joao
    Dzebo, Adis
    Carlsen, Henrik
    Dunn, Miriam
    Juhasz-Horvath, Linda
    Pinter, Laszlo
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2019, 19 (03) : 629 - 642
  • [29] New climate change information modifies frames and decisions of decision makers: an exploratory study in forest planning
    Petr, Michal
    Boerboom, L. G. J.
    Ray, Duncan
    van der Veen, Anne
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2016, 16 (04) : 1161 - 1170
  • [30] Climate change and standing freshwaters: informing adaptation strategies for conservation at multiple scales
    Muir, Martin C. A.
    Spray, Christopher J.
    Rowan, John S.
    AREA, 2012, 44 (04) : 411 - 422