Improving Josephson junction reproducibility for superconducting quantum circuits: junction area fluctuation

被引:12
|
作者
Pishchimova, Anastasiya A. [1 ,2 ]
Smirnov, Nikita S. [1 ]
Ezenkova, Daria A. [1 ]
Krivko, Elizaveta A. [1 ]
Zikiy, Evgeniy V. [1 ]
Moskalev, Dmitry O. [1 ]
Ivanov, Anton I. [1 ]
Korshakov, Nikita D. [1 ]
Rodionov, Ilya A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Bauman Moscow State Tech Univ, FMN Lab, Moscow 105005, Russia
[2] VNIIA, Dukhov Automat Res Inst, Moscow 127030, Russia
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-34051-9
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Josephson superconducting qubits and parametric amplifiers are prominent examples of superconducting quantum circuits that have shown rapid progress in recent years. As such devices become more complex, the requirements for reproducibility of their electrical properties across a chip are being tightened. Critical current of the Josephson junction Ic is the essential electrical parameter in a chip. So, its variation is to be minimized. According to the Ambegaokar-Baratoff formula, critical current is related to normal-state resistance, which can be measured at room temperature. In this study, we focused on the dominant source of non-uniformity for the Josephson junction critical current-junction area variation. We optimized Josephson junction fabrication process and demonstrated resistance variation of 9.8-4.4% and 4.8-2.3% across 22 x 22 mm(2) and 5 x 10 mm(2) chip areas, respectively. For a wide range of junction areas from 0.008 to 0.12 mu m2, we ensure a small linewidth standard deviation of 4 nm measured over 4500 junctions with linear dimensions from 80 to 680 nm. We found that the dominate source of junction area variation limiting I-c reproducibility is the imperfection of the evaporation system. The developed fabrication process was tested on superconducting highly coherent transmon qubits (T1 > 100 mu s) and a nonlinear asymmetric inductive element parametric amplifier.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving Josephson junction reproducibility for superconducting quantum circuits: junction area fluctuation
    Anastasiya A. Pishchimova
    Nikita S. Smirnov
    Daria A. Ezenkova
    Elizaveta A. Krivko
    Evgeniy V. Zikiy
    Dmitry O. Moskalev
    Anton I. Ivanov
    Nikita D. Korshakov
    Ilya A. Rodionov
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [2] Quantum fractional resonances in superconducting circuits with an embedded Josephson junction
    Denisenko, M. V.
    Munyayev, V. O.
    Satanin, A. M.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SIMULATION IN PHYSICS AND BEYOND 2015, 2016, 681
  • [3] Improving wafer-scale Josephson junction resistance variation in superconducting quantum coherent circuits
    Kreikebaum, J. M.
    O'Brien, K. P.
    Morvan, A.
    Siddiqi, I
    SUPERCONDUCTOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 33 (06):
  • [4] An Electromagnetic-Flux-Distribution Model for Analyses of Superconducting Josephson Junction Circuits and Quantum Phase-Slip Junction Circuits
    Wang, Yongliang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2022, 32 (05)
  • [5] QUANTUM-THEORY FOR JOSEPHSON-JUNCTION CIRCUITS
    WERNER, MJ
    DRUMMOND, PD
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1991, 43 (11): : 6414 - 6417
  • [6] Quantum Josephson junction circuits and the dawn of artificial atoms
    John M. Martinis
    Michel H. Devoret
    John Clarke
    Nature Physics, 2020, 16 : 234 - 237
  • [7] Quantum Josephson junction circuits and the dawn of artificial atoms
    Martinis, John M.
    Devoret, Michel H.
    Clarke, John
    NATURE PHYSICS, 2020, 16 (03) : 234 - 237
  • [8] Complementary Josephson Junction circuits
    Terzioglu, E
    Gupta, D
    Beasley, MR
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 1997, 7 (02) : 3642 - 3645
  • [9] Josephson junction in the quantum mesoscopic electric circuits with charge discreteness
    Pahlavani, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS B, 2018, 32 (11):
  • [10] Superconducting nanoribbon with a constriction: A quantum-confined Josephson junction
    Flammia, L.
    Zhang, L. -F.
    Covaci, L.
    Perali, A.
    Milosevic, M. V.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2018, 97 (13)