Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Green Innovation: Evidence from China's Provincial Panel Data

被引:11
作者
Chen, Lifeng [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Fuxuan [1 ]
Huang, Lingyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou City Univ, Sch Business, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
关键词
foreign direct investment; green innovation; policy environment; marketization level; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY; GOVERNMENT; EMISSIONS; SUBSIDIES; POLICIES; FDI;
D O I
10.3390/su15043318
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The last couple of decades have witnessed growing interest in the academic literature in the conciliation of finance and sustainable development. Foreign direct investment (FDI) faces increasing pressure from both host and home country towards adoptinsg sustainable approaches. Such solutions can be green innovation (GI) for climate change, environmental risks, green processes and products that allow tracking the carbon footprint, as well as many other green technologies. Based on the macro-level data of 31 provinces in China from 2003 to 2020, this paper employed policy environment (PE) and marketization level (ML) as moderating variables to further investigate the impact of FDI on GI. Our results show the following: (1) FDI has a significant positive and dynamic evolution feature of diminishing marginal efficiency on GI. (2) The heterogeneity analysis of regional regression shows that FDI significantly increases GI in the eastern and western regions. In contrast, FDI in the central region inhibits GI but not significantly. (3) Both PE and ML can positively moderate the impact of FDI on GI. Furthermore, our empirical results of the robustness test of 2SLS and GMM are highly consistent with the main test. The conclusions of this paper provide policy implications for local governments to fully and effectively utilize foreign capital for green innovation activities.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela [J].
Aitken, BJ ;
Harrison, AE .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :605-618
[2]   Making connections: a review of supply chain management and sustainability literature [J].
Ashby, Alison ;
Leat, Mike ;
Hudson-Smith, Melanie .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2012, 17 (05) :497-516
[3]   Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence [J].
Autant-Bernard, Corinne ;
Fadairo, Muriel ;
Massard, Nadine .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (01) :196-210
[4]   The impacts of government R&D subsidies on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms [J].
Bai, Yu ;
Song, Siyi ;
Jiao, Jianling ;
Yang, Ranran .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 (819-829) :819-829
[5]  
Birdsall N., 1993, J. Environ. Dev., V2, P137, DOI [10.1177/107049659300200107, DOI 10.1177/107049659300200107]
[6]   Spillover effects and the evolution of firm clusters [J].
Bischi, GI ;
Dawid, H ;
Kopel, M .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2003, 50 (01) :47-75
[7]   Using Scenarios to Assess Policy Mixes for Resource Efficiency and Eco-Innovation in Different Fiscal Policy Frameworks [J].
Bontoux, Laurent ;
Bengtsson, Daniel .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (04)
[8]   REGULATION AS A MEANS FOR THE SOCIAL-CONTROL OF TECHNOLOGY [J].
BRAUN, E ;
WIELD, D .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 1994, 6 (03) :259-272
[9]   Revisiting marketization: from interface-markets to market-agencements [J].
Callon, Michel .
CONSUMPTION MARKETS & CULTURE, 2016, 19 (01) :17-37
[10]   Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Technological Breakthroughs: An analysis of US State-Level Patenting [J].
Castaldi, Carolina ;
Frenken, Koen ;
Los, Bart .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2015, 49 (05) :767-781