Effect of the Location of Tetanic Stimulation on Autonomic Responses: A Randomized Cross-Over Pilot Study

被引:0
作者
Talke, Pekka [1 ]
Talke, Isabel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Med, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, CA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH | 2024年 / 17卷
关键词
tetanic stimulus; antinociception; pain; anatomical location; photoplethysmography; COMPOSITE VARIABILITY INDEX; SURGICAL STRESS INDEX; NOCICEPTION; FINGER; PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; BALANCE; LEVEL; EAR;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S443058
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Tetanic stimuli are used as standardized noxious inputs to investigate nociception. Previous studies have applied tetanic stimuli to various anatomical locations without validating that the resulting physiological responses were independent of the location where tetanic stimuli were applied. Our aim was to investigate the effects of three anatomical tetanic stimulus application sites on physiological variables reflecting autonomic nervous system responses as measured by photoplethysmography (PPG).Methods: Under general anesthesia, a five second, 100 hertz, 70 milliamp tetanic stimulus was applied to the ulnar nerve, medial side of the tibia, and thorax (T5 dermatome) (N=12). The effect of tetanic stimuli on PPG-derived variables (AC, DC, and ACDC) and pulse rate at each stimulus location was determined using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. Maximum tetanic stimulus-induced changes in PPG-derived variables and pulse rates were compared among the three stimulus locations using ANOVA.Results: AC and ACDC values of PPG decreased, and the DC values of PPG increased in response to tetanic stimuli-induced vasoconstriction at each location (p<0.001 for all). The maximum changes in the AC, ACDC, and DC values did not differ between locations (p=NS). There were no significant changes in pulse rate (p=NS).Conclusion: The results showed that tetanic stimulation at either of these three locations provides the same autonomic nervous system responses, as measured by PPG. Plain Language Summary: We studied how pain medications and anesthetics reduce pain in humans. The amount of pain experienced by a person can be assessed by administering a slightly uncomfortable test, such as a small electric shock to the skin. These tests are often performed before and after administering a person's pain medication or anesthesia. It is not known if the test results change when an electric shock is applied to different areas of the body (eg, hand, leg, or chest). In this study, we applied small electric shocks to three areas of skin. We measured the participants' responses to this test using a special medical equipment (pulse oximeter), which tells us how the body reacts to an uncomfortable stimulus. We found that the test results were the same regardless of the area where the electric shock was applied. This information will be useful for investigators studying pain and pain management.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 217
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Similarity in bilateral photoplethysmographic peripheral pulse wave characteristics at the ears, thumbs and toes
    Allen, J
    Murray, A
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2000, 21 (03) : 369 - 377
  • [2] Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement
    Allen, John
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2007, 28 (03) : R1 - R39
  • [3] Awad AA, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P1483
  • [4] Photoplethysmographic measurement of changes in total and pulsatile tissue blood volume, following sympathetic blockade
    Babchenko, A
    Davidson, E
    Ginosar, Y
    Kurz, V
    Faib, I
    Adler, D
    Nitzan, M
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 22 (02) : 389 - 396
  • [5] Assessing the antinociceptive effect of nitrous oxide to tetanic stimulation in anaesthetised patients with new intra-operative nociception monitors An observational study
    Coulombe, Marie-Andree
    Decary, Elizabeth
    Maximos, Sarah
    Brulotte, Veronique
    Drolet, Pierre
    Tanoubi, Issam
    Issa, Rami
    Zaphiratos, Valerie
    Verdonck, Olivier
    Fortier, Louis-Philippe
    Godin, Nadia
    Idrissi, Moulay
    Raft, Julien
    Richebe, Philippe
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 38 (05) : 512 - 523
  • [6] Assessing pain objectively: the use of physiological markers
    Cowen, R.
    Stasiowska, M. K.
    Laycock, H.
    Bantel, C.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 70 (07) : 828 - 847
  • [7] The Response of the Composite Variability Index to a Standardized Noxious Stimulus During Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia
    Ellerkmann, Richard Klaus
    Grass, Annekathrin
    Hoeft, Andreas
    Soehle, Martin
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 116 (03) : 580 - 588
  • [8] Validation of Innovative Techniques for Monitoring Nociception during General Anesthesia A Clinical Study Using Tetanic and Intracutaneous Electrical Stimulation
    Funcke, Sandra
    Sauerlaender, Sven
    Pinnschmidt, Hans O.
    Saugel, Bernd
    Bremer, Kai
    Reuter, Daniel A.
    Nitzschke, Rainer
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 127 (02) : 272 - 283
  • [9] Influence of nociceptive stimulation on analgesia nociception index (ANI) during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia
    Gruenewald, M.
    Ilies, C.
    Herz, J.
    Schoenherr, T.
    Fudickar, A.
    Hoecker, J.
    Bein, B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 110 (06) : 1024 - 1030
  • [10] Prediction of Movement to Surgical Stimulation by the Pupillary Dilatation Reflex Amplitude Evoked by a Standardized Noxious Test
    Guglielminotti, Jean
    Grillot, Nicolas
    Paule, Marine
    Mentre, France
    Servin, Frederique
    Montravers, Philippe
    Longrois, Dan
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 122 (05) : 985 - 993