Machine learning algorithms to predict intraoperative hemorrhage in surgical patients: a modeling study of real-world data in Shanghai, China

被引:4
作者
Shi, Ying [1 ]
Zhang, Guangming [2 ]
Ma, Chiye [3 ]
Xu, Jiading [3 ]
Xu, Kejia [2 ]
Zhang, Wenyi [2 ]
Wu, Jianren [3 ]
Xu, Liling [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Tongren Hosp, Hongqiao Int Inst Med, Sch Med, 1111 XianXia Rd, Shanghai 200336, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Tongren Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Sch Med, 1111 XianXia Rd, Shanghai 200336, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Inst Comp Technol, 546 YuYuan Rd, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
关键词
Intraoperative hemorrhage; Machine learning; Gradient boosting decision Tree; LGBoost; BLOOD-TRANSFUSION; BLEEDING COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY; MORTALITY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-023-02253-w
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPrediction tools for various intraoperative bleeding events remain scarce. We aim to develop machine learning-based models and identify the most important predictors by real-world data from electronic medical records (EMRs).MethodsAn established database of surgical inpatients in Shanghai was utilized for analysis. A total of 51,173 inpatients were assessed for eligibility. 48,543 inpatients were obtained in the dataset and patients were divided into haemorrhage (N = 9728) and without-haemorrhage (N = 38,815) groups according to their bleeding during the procedure. Candidate predictors were selected from 27 variables, including sex (N = 48,543), age (N = 48,543), BMI (N = 48,543), renal disease (N = 26), heart disease (N = 1309), hypertension (N = 9579), diabetes (N = 4165), coagulopathy (N = 47), and other features. The models were constructed by 7 machine learning algorithms, i.e., light gradient boosting (LGB), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), cathepsin B (CatB), Ada-boosting of decision tree (AdaB), logistic regression (LR), long short-term memory (LSTM), and multilayer perception (MLP). An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the model performance.ResultsThe mean age of the inpatients was 53 & PLUSMN; 17 years, and 57.5% were male. LGB showed the best predictive performance for intraoperative bleeding combining multiple indicators (AUC = 0.933, sensitivity = 0.87, specificity = 0.85, accuracy = 0.87) compared with XGB, CatB, AdaB, LR, MLP and LSTM. The three most important predictors identified by LGB were operative time, D-dimer (DD), and age.ConclusionsWe proposed LGB as the best Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) algorithm for the evaluation of intraoperative bleeding. It is considered a simple and useful tool for predicting intraoperative bleeding in clinical settings. Operative time, DD, and age should receive attention.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Fish Oil and Perioperative Bleeding Insights From the OPERA Randomized Trial [J].
Akintoye, Emmanuel ;
Sethi, Prince ;
Harris, William S. ;
Thompson, Paul A. ;
Marchioli, Roberto ;
Tavazzi, Luigi ;
Latini, Roberto ;
Pretorius, Mias ;
Brown, Nancy J. ;
Libby, Peter ;
Mozaffarian, Dariush .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2018, 11 (11)
[2]   HEMATOCRIT AND BLEEDING-TIME - AN UPDATE [J].
ANAND, A ;
FEFFER, SE .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 87 (03) :299-301
[3]  
B T: PHYSIOLOGY OF BLOOD COAGULATION, 2007, JURNALUL CHIRURGIE, V3, P102
[4]   Machine Learning and Real-World Data: More than Just Buzzwords [J].
Bakouny, Ziad ;
Patt, Debra A. .
JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2021, 5 :811-813
[5]   Intraoperative bleeding and haemostasis during pelvic surgery for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer: a prospective evaluation [J].
Bonello, V. A. ;
Bhangu, A. ;
Fitzgerald, J. E. F. ;
Rasheed, S. ;
Tekkis, P. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 18 (10) :887-893
[6]   NEAREST NEIGHBOR PATTERN CLASSIFICATION [J].
COVER, TM ;
HART, PE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1967, 13 (01) :21-+
[7]   Prognostic factors for VTE and bleeding in hospitalized medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Darzi, Andrea J. ;
Karam, Samer G. ;
Charide, Rana ;
Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Itziar ;
Cushman, Mary ;
Gould, Michael K. ;
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence ;
Spencer, Frederick A. ;
Spyropoulos, Alex C. ;
Streiff, Michael B. ;
Woller, Scott ;
Zakai, Neil A. ;
Germini, Federico ;
Rigoni, Marta ;
Agarwal, Arnav ;
Morsi, Rami Z. ;
Iorio, Alfonso ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Schunemann, Holger J. .
BLOOD, 2020, 135 (20) :1788-1810
[8]   Risk prediction of major haemorrhage with surgical treatment of live cesarean scar pregnancies [J].
De Braud, Lucrezia, V ;
Knez, Jure ;
Mavrelos, Dimitrios ;
Thanatsis, Nikolaos ;
Jauniaux, Eric ;
Jurkovic, Davor .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 264 :224-231
[9]   Gut microbiome and health: mechanistic insights [J].
de Vos, Willem M. ;
Tilg, Herbert ;
Van Hul, Matthias ;
Cani, Patrice D. .
GUT, 2022, 71 (05) :1020-1032
[10]   Machine learning from clinical data sets of a contemporary decision for orthodontic tooth extraction [J].
Etemad, Lily ;
Wu, Tai-Hsien ;
Heiner, Parker ;
Liu, Jie ;
Lee, Sanghee ;
Chao, Wei-Lun ;
Zaytoun, Mary Lanier ;
Guez, Camille ;
Lin, Feng-Chang ;
Jackson, Christina Bonebreak ;
Ko, Ching-Chang .
ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2021, 24 :193-200