Open education practices: a meta-synthesis of literature

被引:3
作者
Shareefa, Mariyam [1 ]
Moosa, Visal [1 ]
Hammad, Aaida [2 ]
Zuhudha, Aminath [3 ]
Wider, Walton [3 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Univ Maldives, Ctr Res & Publicat, Male, Maldives
[2] Maldives Natl Univ, Fac Arts, Male, Maldives
[3] Islamic Univ Maldives, Ctr Continuing Educ, Male, Maldives
关键词
conceptualisation; literature review; meta-synthesis; open education practices; open education resources; OER;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2023.1121739
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
IntroductionMost of the recent reviews of literature on open education practices (OEP) seem to be limited in their scope, inhibiting their capacity to arrive at a comprehensive understanding of the concept of OEP. Hence, this systematic literature review was conducted with the purpose of analysing past research on OEP in an effort to identify how OEP is theorised and defined in the existing literature. MethodsEmploying a systematic protocol, the literature search was conducted using the Dimensions database. A total of 30 publications were considered for the qualitative analysis, which engaged a thematic approach. ResultsThe findings indicated that the concept of OEP can be explained with a combination of three major components: open education resources, an open teaching and learning process, and open research and scholarly practice. The findings also showed that these components should be grounded in six principles: accessibility, flexibility, shareability, affordability, innovation, and academic freedom. DiscussionsThe findings imply that, in order to meaningfully execute open education practices, each of the three components must be given equal importance and that these practices be well grounded in the identified six principles.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [41] It's Not (Just) About the Cost: Academic Libraries and Intentionally Engaged OER for Social Justice
    Seiferle-Valenci, Marco
    [J]. LIBRARY TRENDS, 2020, 69 (02) : 469 - 487
  • [42] How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses
    Siddaway, Andy P.
    Wood, Alex M.
    Hedges, Larry V.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 70, 2019, 70 : 747 - 770
  • [43] Challenges for Open Education with Educational Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review
    Soledad Ramirez-Montoya, Maria
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (17)
  • [44] Tarling Isabel, 2021, Radical Solutions for Education in Africa: Open Education and Self-directed Learning in the Continent. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, P187, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-4099-5_10
  • [45] UNESCO, 2020, Open education resources
  • [46] Assumptions and Challenges of Open Scholarship
    Veletsianos, George
    Kimmons, Royce
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2012, 13 (04): : 166 - 189
  • [47] Mapping the Open Education Landscape: Citation Network Analysis of Historical Open and Distance Education Research
    Weller, Martin
    Jordan, Katy
    DeVries, Irwin
    Rolfe, Viv
    [J]. OPEN PRAXIS, 2018, 10 (02): : 109 - 126
  • [48] Wiley D., 2014, DEFIING OPEN OPEN CO
  • [49] Wiley D.A., 2012, GAME CHANGERS ED INF, P81
  • [50] Wiley D, 2018, INT REV RES OPEN DIS, V19, P133