The use of artificial intelligence for automating or semi-automating biomedical literature analyses: A scoping review

被引:17
作者
dos Santos, Alisson Oliveira [1 ]
da Silva, Eduardo Sergio [1 ]
Couto, Leticia Machado [1 ]
Reis, Gustavo Valadares Labanca [2 ]
Belo, Vinicius Silva [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Joao del Rei, Campus Ctr Oeste Dona Lindu, Divinopolis, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Ouro Preto, Sch Med, Campus Morro Cruzeiro, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
关键词
Evidence-based medicine; Systematic reviews; Randomized controlled trials; Machine learning; Deep learning; Natural language processing; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; TEXT CATEGORIZATION MODELS; PICO ELEMENT DETECTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; BIAS ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; KNOWLEDGE-BASE; SUPPORT; QUALITY; WORKLOAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104389
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Objective: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a decision-making process based on the conscious and judicious use of the best available scientific evidence. However, the exponential increase in the amount of information currently available likely exceeds the capacity of human-only analysis. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) and its branches such as machine learning (ML) can be used to facilitate human efforts in analyzing the literature to foster EBM. The present scoping review aimed to examine the use of AI in the automation of biomedical literature survey and analysis with a view to establishing the state-of-the-art and identifying knowledge gaps. Materials and methods: Comprehensive searches of the main databases were performed for articles published up to June 2022 and studies were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from the included articles and the findings categorized. Results: The total number of records retrieved from the databases was 12,145, of which 273 were included in the review. Classification of the studies according to the use of AI in evaluating the biomedical literature revealed three main application groups, namely assembly of scientific evidence (n = 127; 47%), mining the biomedical literature (n = 112; 41%) and quality analysis (n = 34; 12%). Most studies addressed the preparation of systematic reviews, while articles focusing on the development of guidelines and evidence synthesis were the least frequent. The biggest knowledge gap was identified within the quality analysis group, particularly regarding methods and tools that assess the strength of recommendation and consistency of evidence. Conclusion: Our review shows that, despite significant progress in the automation of biomedical literature surveys and analyses in recent years, intense research is needed to fill knowledge gaps on more difficult aspects of ML, deep learning and natural language processing, and to consolidate the use of automation by end-users (biomedical researchers and healthcare professionals).
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 303 条
  • [1] Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review
    Abdelkader, Wael
    Navarro, Tamara
    Parrish, Rick
    Cotoi, Chris
    Germini, Federico
    Iorio, Alfonso
    Haynes, R. Brian
    Lokker, Cynthia
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [2] Impact of Automatic Query Generation and Quality Recognition Using Deep Learning to Curate Evidence From Biomedical Literature: Empirical Study
    Afzal, Muhammad
    Hussain, Maqbool
    Malik, Khalid Mahmood
    Lee, Sungyoung
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 7 (04) : 111 - 135
  • [3] Feasibility study and evaluation of expert opinion on the semi-automated meta-analysis and the conventional meta-analysis
    Ajiji, Priscilla
    Cottin, Judith
    Picot, Cyndie
    Uzunali, Anil
    Ripoche, Emmanuelle
    Cucherat, Michel
    Maison, Patrick
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 78 (07) : 1177 - 1184
  • [4] Akhtyamova L, 2020, PROC CONF OPEN INNOV, P3, DOI [10.23919/FRUCT48808.2020.9087359, 10.23919/fruct48808.2020.9087359]
  • [5] Alatrash M., 2014, 2014 IEEE C NORB WIE, P1, DOI [10.1109/NORBERT.2014.6893940, DOI 10.1109/NORBERT.2014.6893940]
  • [6] Alatrash Massuod., 2012, North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, P1, DOI [10.1109/NAFIPS.2012.6290999, DOI 10.1109/NAFIPS.2012.6290999]
  • [7] Machine Learning for Biomedical Literature Triage
    Almeida, Hayda
    Meurs, Marie-Jean
    Kosseim, Leila
    Butler, Greg
    Tsang, Adrian
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [8] Alsawas Mouaz, 2016, Evid Based Med, V21, P136, DOI 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110437
  • [9] Alshaya H., 2021, COMPUT METH PROG BIO, V205, DOI [10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.105976, DOI 10.1016/J.CMPB.2021.105976]
  • [10] Alsulami Mashael M., 2018, 2018 1st International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS). Proceedings, DOI 10.1109/CAIS.2018.8471687