Comparing the Psychometric Properties of a Scale Across Three Likert and Three Alternative Formats: An Application to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

被引:5
|
作者
Zhang, Xijuan [1 ]
Zhou, Linnan [2 ]
Savalei, Victoria [2 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
Likert format; alternative format; Expanded format; Item-Specific format; Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale; factor structure; ITEM-SPECIFIC QUESTIONS; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; FIT INDEXES; NARCISSISM; BIPOLAR; AGREE/DISAGREE; ACQUIESCENCE; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1177/00131644221111402
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Zhang and Savalei proposed an alternative scale format to the Likert format, called the Expanded format. In this format, response options are presented in complete sentences, which can reduce acquiescence bias and method effects. The goal of the current study was to compare the psychometric properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) in the Expanded format and in two other alternative formats, relative to several versions of the traditional Likert format. We conducted two studies to compare the psychometric properties of the RSES across the different formats. We found that compared with the Likert format, the alternative formats tend to have a unidimensional factor structure, less response inconsistency, and comparable validity. In addition, we found that the Expanded format resulted in the best factor structure among the three alternative formats. Researchers should consider the Expanded format, especially when creating short psychological scales such as the RSES.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 683
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of Rosenberg self-esteem scale among Norwegian adolescents - psychometric properties across samples
    Moksnes, U. K.
    Espnes, G. A.
    Eilertsen, M. E. B.
    Bjornsen, H. N.
    Ringdal, R.
    Haugan, Gorill
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [2] Improved Properties of the Big Five Inventory and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the Expanded Format Relative to the Likert Format
    Zhang, Xijuan
    Tse, Winnie Wing-Yee
    Savalei, Victoria
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [3] Structure of Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale:: Three-factor solution
    Blatny, Marek
    Urbanek, Tomas
    Osecka, Lida
    STUDIA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2006, 48 (04) : 371 - 378
  • [4] Utility of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
    Davis, Clare
    Kellett, Stephen
    Beail, Nigel
    AJIDD-AMERICAN JOURNAL ON INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2009, 114 (03): : 172 - 178
  • [5] Psychometric properties of the Telugu version of Rosenberg Self-esteem scale (RSES-T)
    Billa, A. L.
    Sukhabogi, J. R.
    Doshi, D.
    Jummala, S.
    ANNALI DI IGIENE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA E DI COMUNITA, 2023, 35 (05): : 511 - 520
  • [6] Psychometric Properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Overall and Across Demographic Groups Living Within the United States
    Sinclair, Samuel J.
    Blais, Mark A.
    Gansler, David A.
    Sandberg, Elisabeth
    Bistis, Kimberly
    LoCicero, Alice
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2010, 33 (01) : 56 - 80
  • [7] Investigating the Psychometric Properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale for South African Residents of Greater Pretoria
    Westaway, Margaret S.
    Jordaan, Esme R.
    Tsai, Jennifer
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2015, 38 (02) : 181 - 199
  • [8] How Does the Number of Response Options Impact the Psychometric Properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale?
    Donnellan, M. Brent
    Rakhshani, Andrew
    ASSESSMENT, 2023, 30 (06) : 1737 - 1749
  • [9] The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale as a Measure of Self-Esteem for the Noninstitutionalized Elderly
    Classen, Sherrilene
    Velozo, Craig A.
    Mann, William C.
    CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST, 2007, 31 (01) : 77 - 93
  • [10] The Efficient Assessment of Self-Esteem: Proposing the Brief Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
    Monteiro, Renan P.
    Coelho, Gabriel Lins de Holanda
    Hanel, Paul H. P.
    de Medeiros, Emerson Diogenes
    da Silva, Phillip Dyamond Gomes
    APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, 2022, 17 (02) : 931 - 947