Functional assessment of total hip arthroplasty using inertial measurement units: Improvement in gait kinematics and association with patient-reported outcome measures

被引:6
作者
Kaufmann, Mara [1 ]
Nueesch, Corina [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Clauss, Martin [1 ,5 ]
Pagenstert, Geert [2 ,6 ]
Eckardt, Anke [7 ]
Ilchmann, Thomas [7 ]
Stoffel, Karl [1 ]
Muendermann, Annegret [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ismailidis, Petros [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Clin Res, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel, Dept Biomed Engn, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Spine Surg, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Univ Hosp Basel, Ctr Musculoskeletal Infect, Basel, Switzerland
[6] Clarahof Clin Orthopaed Surg, Basel, Switzerland
[7] Hirslanden Klin, ENDO Team, Birshof, Munchenstein, Switzerland
关键词
gait analysis; hip osteoarthritis; inertial measurement units; patient reported outcome measure; total hip arthroplasty; WALKING SPEED; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PARAMETERS; KNEE; TREADMILL; RECOVERY; SURGERY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1002/jor.25421
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are commonly used for gait assessment, yet their potential for quantifying improvements in gait function and patterns after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been fully explored. The primary aim of this study was to compare spatiotemporal parameters and sagittal plane kinematic patterns of patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) before and after THA, and to asymptomatic controls. The secondary aim was to assess the association between dynamic hip range of motion (ROM) during walking and the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS). Twenty-four patients with hip OA and 24 matched asymptomatic controls completed gait analyses using the RehaGait (R) sensor system. Patients were evaluated pre- and 1 year postoperatively, controls in a single visit. Differences in kinematic data were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping, and correlations between dynamic hip ROM and HOOS were calculated. Walking speed and stride length significantly increased (+0.08 m/s, p = 0.019; +0.06 m, p = 0.048) after THA but did not reach the level of asymptomatic controls (-0.11 m/s, p = 0.028; -0.14 m, p = 0.001). Preoperative hip and knee kinematics differed significantly from controls. After THA, they improved significantly and did not differ from controls. Dynamic hip flexion-extension ROM correlated positively with all HOOS subscores (r > 0.417; p <= 0.001). The change in HOOS symptoms in patients was explained by the combination of baseline HOOS symptoms and change in dynamic hip ROM (r(2) = 0.748) suggesting that the additional information gained with IMU gait analysis helps to complement and objectify patient-reported outcome measures pre- and postoperatively and monitor treatment-related improvements.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 770
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Same but Different? Exploring the Role of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Clinician-Reported Outcome Measures in Postoperative Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Rehabilitation
    Unger, Alexandra
    Pruefer, Ferdinand
    Matko, Spela
    Fischer, Michael J.
    Grote, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (07)
  • [42] Socioeconomic inequalities in patient-reported outcome measures among total hip and knee arthroplasty patients: a comprehensive analysis of instruments and domains
    Joshua M. Bonsel
    Max Reijman
    Erin M. Macri
    Jan A. N. Verhaar
    Liza N. van Steenbergen
    Gouke J. Bonsel
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 24 (1)
  • [43] Early Experience and Results Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
    Stiegel, Kelly R.
    Lash, Jonathan G.
    Peace, Andrew J.
    Coleman, Michelle M.
    Harrington, Melvyn A.
    Cahill, Catherine W.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (10) : 2313 - 2318
  • [44] Does Acetabular Bone Loss Severity Associate With Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Reoperation Rate in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Driscoll, Daniel A.
    Anderson, Christopher G.
    Bornes, Troy D.
    Nocon, Allina
    Bostrom, Mathias P. G.
    Sculco, Thomas P.
    Sculco, Peter K.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07) : S189 - S193
  • [45] Rationing for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using the New Zealand Orthopaedic Association Score: Effectiveness and Comparison With Patient-Reported Scores
    Gwynne-Jones, David P.
    Iosua, Ella E.
    Stout, Kirsten M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (05) : 957 - 962
  • [46] Patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates, and re-revision rates are not associated with the indication for revision total hip arthroplasty
    Innocenti, M.
    Smulders, K.
    Willems, J. H.
    Goosen, J. H. M.
    van Hellemondt, G.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2022, 104B (07) : 859 - 866
  • [47] Can Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Measures Differentiate Patients Who Will Undergo Hip and Knee Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
    Horn, Maggie E.
    George, Steven Z.
    Goode, Adam P.
    Reinke, Emily K.
    Scott, Lily G.
    Bolognesi, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (06) : S56 - S62
  • [48] Is the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Feasible in Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients?
    Lawrie, Charles M.
    Abu-Amer, Wahid Y.
    Clohisy, John C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (01) : 6 - 12
  • [49] All types of component malrotation affect the early patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty
    Abdelnasser, Mohammad Kamal
    Elsherif, Mohamed Eslam
    Bakr, Hatem
    Mahran, Mohamed
    Othman, Moustafa H. M.
    Khalifa, Yaser
    KNEE SURGERY & RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 31 (01)
  • [50] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing patellofemoral arthroplasty and total knee replacement: A comparative study
    Perrone, Fabio Luigi
    Baron, Steffen
    Suero, Eduardo M.
    Lausmann, Christian
    Kendof, Daniel
    Zahar, Akos
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    Citak, Mustafa
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2018, 26 (03) : 507 - 514