Femur development in fetal growth restriction as observed on prenatal magnetic resonance imaging

被引:0
作者
Nemec, S. F. [1 ]
Schwarz-Nemec, U. [1 ,3 ]
Prayer, D. [1 ]
Weber, M. [1 ]
Bettelheim, D. [2 ]
Kasprian, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Biomed Imaging & Image Guided Therapy, Div Neuroradiol & Musculoskeletal Radiol, Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Obstet & Feto Maternal Med, Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Biomed Imaging & Image Guided Therapy, Div Neuroradiol & Musculoskeletal Radiol, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
epiphyseal ossification; femur development; femur shortening; fetal growth restriction; prenatal magnetic resonance imaging; EPIPHYSEAL OSSIFICATION CENTER; PERINATAL-PERIOD; GESTATIONAL-AGE; MENSTRUAL AGE; CHARTS; TERM; CENTERS; SIZE; ABNORMALITIES; PREGNANCIES;
D O I
10.1002/uog.26133
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo investigate human femur development in fetal growth restriction (FGR) by analyzing femur morphometrics and distal epimetaphyseal features on prenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MethodsThis was a retrospective study of 111 fetuses (mean gestational age (GA), 27 + 2 weeks (range, 19-35 weeks)) with FGR associated with placental insufficiency without other major abnormalities and 111 GA-matched normal controls. On 1.5-Tesla echoplanar MRI, femur morphometrics, including diaphyseal length, epiphyseal length and epiphyseal width, were assessed. Using a previously reported grading system, epimetaphyseal features, including cartilaginous epiphyseal shape, metaphyseal shape and epiphyseal ossification, were analyzed qualitatively. To compare FGR cases and controls, the paired t-test was used to assess morphometrics, generalized estimating equations were used for epimetaphyseal features and time-to-event analysis was used to assess the visibility of epiphyseal ossification. ResultsThere were significant differences in femur morphometrics between FGR cases and controls (all parameters, P < 0.001), with bone shortening observed in FGR. No significant differences were found in the distribution of epimetaphyseal features between FGR cases and controls (epiphyseal shape, P = 0.341; metaphyseal shape, P = 0.782; epiphyseal ossification, P = 0.85). Epiphyseal ossification was visible at a median of 33.6 weeks in FGR cases and at 32.1 weeks in controls (P = 0.008). ConclusionsOn prenatal MRI, cases with FGR associated with placental insufficiency exhibit diaphyseal and epiphyseal shortening of the femur. However, FGR cases and normal controls share similarly graded distal epimetaphyseal features. Consequently, these features may not be appropriate MRI characteristics for the identification of FGR. (c) 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 609
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [2] Peak Bone Mass and Bone Microarchitecture in Adults Born With Low Birth Weight Preterm or at Term: A Cohort Study
    Balasuriya, Chandima N. D.
    Evensen, Kari Anne I.
    Mosti, Mats P.
    Brubakk, Ann-Mari
    Jacobsen, Geir W.
    Indredavik, Marit S.
    Schei, Berit
    Stunes, Astrid Kamilla
    Syversen, Unni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2017, 102 (07) : 2491 - 2500
  • [3] Perinatal bone turnover in term pregnancies: The influence of intrauterine growth restriction
    Briana, Despina D.
    Gourglotis, Dimitrios
    Boutsikou, Maria
    Baka, Stavroula
    Hassiakos, Dimitrios
    Vraila, Venetia-Maria
    Creatsas, George
    Malamitsi-Puchner, Arladne
    [J]. BONE, 2008, 42 (02) : 307 - 313
  • [4] Intrauterine growth restriction may not suppress bone formation at term, as indicated by circulating concentrations of undercarboxylated osteocalcin and Dickkopf-1
    Briana, Despina D.
    Gourgiotis, Dimitrios
    Georgiadis, Anestis
    Boutsikou, Maria
    Baka, Stavroula
    Marmarinos, Antonios
    Hassiakos, Dimitrios
    Malamitsi-Puchner, Ariadne
    [J]. METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2012, 61 (03): : 335 - 340
  • [5] Circulating Osteoprotegerin and sRANKL Concentrations in the Perinatal Period at Term The Impact of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
    Briana, Despina D.
    Boutsikou, Maria
    Baka, Stavroula
    Hassiakos, Demetrios
    Gourgiotis, Demetrios
    Malamitsi-Puchner, Ariadne
    [J]. NEONATOLOGY, 2009, 96 (02) : 132 - 136
  • [6] Fetal imaging in a new era
    Brunelle, F
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (02) : 91 - 95
  • [7] Pathophysiology of placental-derived fetal growth restriction
    Burton, Graham J.
    Jauniaux, Eric
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (02) : S745 - S761
  • [8] Intrauterine Growth Restriction Decreases Endochondral Ossification and Bone Strength in Female Rats
    Chen, Haiyan
    Miller, Scott
    Lane, Robert H.
    Moyer-Mileur, Laurie J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2013, 30 (04) : 261 - 266
  • [9] Chen Q, 2001, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V12, P67, DOI 10.1097/00002142-200102000-00007
  • [10] CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .3. ABDOMINAL MEASUREMENTS
    CHITTY, LS
    ALTMAN, DG
    HENDERSON, A
    CAMPBELL, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (02): : 125 - 131