Clinical application of the 21-gene oncotype recurrence score in an older cohort: A single center experience

被引:1
|
作者
Chiru, E. D. [1 ]
Kuhar, C. Grasic [2 ]
Oseledchyk, A. [1 ]
Schotzau, A. [5 ]
Gonzalez, M. J. [6 ]
Kurzeder, C. [4 ]
Vetter, M. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Basel Univ Hosp, Med Oncol, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Inst Oncol Ljubljana, Med Oncol Dept, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Cantonal Hosp Baselland, Ctr Oncol & Hematol, Liestal, Switzerland
[4] Basel Univ Hosp, Breast Ctr, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Basel Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Basel, Switzerland
[6] Adullam Hosp & Care Ctr, Basel, Switzerland
来源
TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 36卷
关键词
Early breast cancer; 21-gene score; Older patients; Estrogen receptor positive; Chemotherapy; Endocrine therapy; BREAST-CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101724
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In early luminal breast cancer, the Oncotype DX & REG; Recurrence Score (RS) prognostic and predictive value with regards to chemotherapy (CHT) application benefit has been broadly validated. In older patients its value has not been deeply addressed. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of RS testing and to look at differences in treatment allocation for these patients when compared with younger ones.Methods: We included data from consecutive patients with early luminal HER2-negative breast cancer, treated between 2010 and 2022 at the University Hospital Basel and Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Switzerland. The older cohort included 63 (19%) patients aged >70, and the younger cohort 263 (81%) patients aged <70.Results: Older breast cancer patients had more co-morbidities (N = 36, 57% vs. N = 92, 35%, p = 0.002) and a higher clinical risk status (N = 49, 78% vs. N = 155, 59%; p = 0.01) when compared to younger patients. Histopathologic characteristics were significantly different between the two cohorts. Although older patients had a higher clinical risk status (78% vs. 59%) (p = 0.01), most of them (74%) received no CHT. Specifically, adjuvant CHT was administered less frequently in older than in younger patients (13% vs. 22%; p = 0.01). Moreover, older patients were less likely to complete CHT (>4 cycles: 78% vs. 97%).Conclusion: Breast cancer patients aged >70 have higher clinical risk status, more co-morbidities, higher clinical stage (driven by larger tumor size), and more often RS >26. However, they receive fewer adjuvant RT and CHT than those aged <70. RS maintains its independent prognostic value in older patients. However, assessing the predictive value of additional CHT benefit remains challenging due to significant differences in CHT adminis-tration. Although therapy decision-making in older patients with breast cancer still follows RS-based guidelines, clinical practice indicates an individualized treatment approach.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation oncotype DX® 21-gene recurrence score and clinicopathological parameters: a single institutional experience
    Lashen, Ayat
    Toss, Michael S.
    Fadhil, Wakkas
    Oni, Georgette
    Madhusudan, Srinivasan
    Rakha, Emad
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2023, 82 (05) : 755 - 766
  • [2] The 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay (Oncotype DX™) in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Male Breast Cancer: Experience in an Israeli Cohort
    Grenader, Tal
    Yerushalmi, Rinat
    Tokar, Margarita
    Fried, Georgeta
    Kaufman, Bella
    Peretz, Tamar
    Geffen, David B.
    ONCOLOGY, 2014, 87 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [3] What Is the Value of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score?
    Brauchli, Peter
    Thuerlimann, Beat
    Crowe, Susanne N.
    Herrmann, Richard
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (32) : E671 - E672
  • [4] Oncotype DX 21-gene test has a low recurrence score in both pure and mixed mucinous breast carcinoma
    Chen, Rui
    Wang, Yun
    Li, Taolang
    Lv, Junyuan
    Feng, Guoli
    Tan, Na
    Wang, Jinjing
    Cheng, Xiaoming
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2021, 22 (05)
  • [5] Application of a 21-Gene Recurrence Score in a Swiss Single-Center Breast Cancer Population: A Comparative Analysis of Treatment Administration before and after TAILORx
    Chiru, Elena Diana
    Oseledchyk, Anton
    Schoetzau, Andreas
    Kurzeder, Christian
    Mosimann, Raphael
    Vetter, Marcus
    Kuhar, Cvetka Grasic
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [6] Implementation of the 21-gene recurrence score test in the United States in 2011
    Lynch, Julie A.
    Berse, Brygida
    Petkov, Valentina
    Filipski, Kelly
    Zhou, Yingjun
    Khoury, Muin J.
    Hassett, Michael
    Freedman, Andrew N.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (10) : 982 - 990
  • [7] The impact of the 21-gene recurrence score (Oncotype DX) on concordance of adjuvant therapy decision making as measured by the Liverpool Systemic Therapy Adjuvant Decision Tool
    Olsson-Brown, Anna
    Piskilidis, Pavlos
    O'Hagan, Julie
    Thorp, Nicky
    Robson, Peter
    Innes, Helen
    Wong, Helen
    Cicconi, Silvia
    Jackson, Richard
    Kiernan, Tamara
    Holcombe, Christopher
    O'Reilly, Susan
    Palmieri, Carlo
    BREAST, 2019, 44 : 94 - 100
  • [8] Implications of the 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX) on adjuvant treatment decisions in ER-positive early-stage breast cancer patients: experience of Kuwait Cancer Control Center
    Fayaz, Salah
    Eissa, Heba El-Sayed
    Demian, Gerges Attia
    JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2020, 32 (01)
  • [9] The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Male Breast Cancer
    Turashvili, Gulisa
    Gonzalez-Loperena, Monica
    Brogi, Edi
    Dickler, Maura
    Norton, Larry
    Morrow, Monica
    Wen, Hannah Y.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (06) : 1530 - 1535
  • [10] Association of 21-gene recurrence score and locoregional recurrence in early breast cancer patients
    Zeng, Yufei
    Gao, Weiqi
    Chen, Xiaosong
    Shen, Kunwei
    CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2022, 35 (01) : 111 - 118