Energetic, GHG, and economic analyses of electrified steam methane reforming using conventional reformer tubes

被引:24
作者
Mehanovic, Dino [1 ]
Al-Haiek, Alexandre [2 ]
Leclerc, Philippe [2 ]
Rancourt, David [1 ]
Frechette, Luc [1 ]
Picard, Mathieu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Mech Engn, 2500 Boul Univ, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[2] LAh Serv GP, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Hydrogen; Steam methane reforming; Decarbonization; Electric; Techno-economic; WATER-GAS SHIFT; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; CO2; CAPTURE; OPTIMIZATION; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116549
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
A concept for electrified Steam Methane Reforming (eSMR) based on reformer tubes is proposed as a pathway for hydrogen decarbonization. The proposed concept applies radiant heating elements to a conventional gas-fired reformer. A thermochemical model and a techno-economic framework are developed to evaluate process performance at various conditions and the economic potential of the proposed concept. A baseline scenario with feedstock and electricity priced respectively at $4/MMBtu and $0.04/kWh, and assuming 2% of fugitive methane emissions and 50 gCO2eq/kWh, results in an LCOH of $1.53/kgH2 and a decarbonization cost of $38/tonCO2. The techno-economic results demonstrate that the proposed eSMR process leads to lower LCOH than mainstream alternatives over a wide range of energy prices. The study shows that reformer tube electrification is both economically viable and technically feasible, and therefore has the potential to decarbonize hydrogen production at a low cost.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Hydrogen as an energy vector [J].
Abdin, Zainul ;
Zafaranloo, Ali ;
Rafiee, Ahmad ;
Merida, Walter ;
Lipinski, Wojciech ;
Khalilpour, Kaveh R. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 120
[2]   Assessment of methane emissions from the US oil and gas supply chain [J].
Alvarez, Ramon A. ;
Zavala-Araiza, Daniel ;
Lyon, David R. ;
Allen, David T. ;
Barkley, Zachary R. ;
Brandt, Adam R. ;
Davis, Kenneth J. ;
Herndon, Scott C. ;
Jacob, Daniel J. ;
Karion, Anna ;
Kort, Eric A. ;
Lamb, Brian K. ;
Lauvaux, Thomas ;
Maasakkers, Joannes D. ;
Marchese, Anthony J. ;
Omara, Mark ;
Pacala, Stephen W. ;
Peischl, Jeff ;
Robinson, Allen L. ;
Shepson, Paul B. ;
Sweeney, Colm ;
Townsend-Small, Amy ;
Wofsy, Steven C. ;
Hamburg, Steven P. .
SCIENCE, 2018, 361 (6398) :186-188
[3]  
Ambrosetti M, 2021, FRONT CHEM ENG, V53
[4]  
Australian Competition Consumer Commission, 2021, GAS INQ 2017 2025
[5]  
Birol F., 2019, FUTURE HYDROGEN SEIZ, DOI [10.1787/1-0514c4-en, DOI 10.1787/1-0514C4-EN]
[6]  
Brightling J, 2005, AICHE 50 ANN SAFETY, V46, P190
[7]   Eight-Year Estimates of Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in Western Canada Are Nearly Twice Those Reported in Inventories [J].
Chan, Elton ;
Worthy, Douglas E. J. ;
Chan, Douglas ;
Ishizawa, Misa ;
Moran, Michael D. ;
Delcloo, Andy ;
Vogel, Felix .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (23) :14899-14909
[8]   A METHOD TO OBTAIN A COMPACT REPRESENTATION OF PROCESS PERFORMANCES FROM A NUMERICAL SIMULATOR - EXAMPLE OF PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION FOR PURE HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION [J].
CHLENDI, M ;
TONDEUR, D ;
ROLLAND, F .
GAS SEPARATION & PURIFICATION, 1995, 9 (02) :125-135
[9]   Water gas shift reaction kinetics and reactor modeling for fuel cell grade hydrogen [J].
Choi, Y ;
Stenger, HG .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2003, 124 (02) :432-439
[10]   Hydrogen production for energy: An overview [J].
Dawood, Furat ;
Anda, Martin ;
Shafiullah, G. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (07) :3847-3869