Potential of machine learning algorithms in groundwater level prediction using temporal gravity data

被引:3
作者
Sarkar, Himangshu [1 ]
Goriwale, Swastik Sunil [1 ]
Ghosh, Jayanta Kumar [1 ]
Ojha, Chandra Shekhar Prasad [1 ]
Ghosh, Sanjay Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Roorkee, Dept Civil Engn, Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand, India
关键词
Groundwater level prediction; Temporal gravity; Machine learning; XG-Boost; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101114
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Prediction of groundwater levels with precision and dependability is crucial for effective water resource development and management. This study was carried out to establish the relationship between groundwater level (GWL) and temporal gravity variation through five nonlinear machine learning (ML) models: Polynomial Regression (PR), Random Forest, XG- Boost, K -Nearest Neighbourhood (KNN), and support vector machineradial basic function (SVM-RBF). These models were employed to predict GWL at a specific well located at the Hydrology Department, IIT Roorkee, India. The models were trained and tested using a dataset that includes gravity, time, and relevant hydro -meteorological factors like precipitation (P), temperature (T), evaporation (E), relative humidity (RH), and wind speed (WS). The study is organized into three groups of model runs: the first group considers gravity as the sole input parameter, the second group includes both gravity and time, and the third incorporates all hydro -meteorological parameters. Comparative evaluation of the models was done using four different evaluation metrics, i.e., coefficient of determination (R2), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Nash -Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). Results highlight XG-Boost as the most efficient model for predicting groundwater levels, demonstrating exceptional performance, particularly when gravity and time are the input parameters, yielding a minimum MAE of 0.11 and a maximum R2 of 0.97.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Geoelectric and Geologic Parameters for Spatial Prediction of Groundwater Resources Potential and Aquifer Evaluation
    Adiat, K. A. N.
    Nawawi, M. N. M.
    Abdullah, K.
    [J]. PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2013, 170 (03) : 453 - 471
  • [2] Berrar D., 2019, Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, P542, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20349-X
  • [3] Hybrid computational intelligence models for groundwater potential mapping
    Binh Thai Pham
    Jaafari, Abolfazl
    Prakash, Indra
    Singh, Sushant K.
    Nguyen Kim Quoc
    Dieu Tien Bui
    [J]. CATENA, 2019, 182
  • [4] Forecasting Groundwater Table in a Flood Prone Coastal City with Long Short-term Memory and Recurrent Neural Networks
    Bowes, Benjamin D.
    Sadler, Jeffrey M.
    Morsy, Mohamed M.
    Behl, Madhur
    Goodall, Jonathan L.
    [J]. WATER, 2019, 11 (05)
  • [5] Reduction of surface gravity data from global atmospheric pressure loading
    Boy, JP
    Gegout, P
    Hinderer, J
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 149 (02) : 534 - 545
  • [6] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [7] The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation
    Chicco, Davide
    Warrens, Matthijs J.
    Jurman, Giuseppe
    [J]. PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021,
  • [8] Choubin Bahram, 2020, 2020 IEEE 3rd International Conference and Workshop in Obuda on Electrical and Power Engineering (CANDO-EPE), P000209, DOI 10.1109/CANDO-EPE51100.2020.9337753
  • [9] Choubin B., 2021, WATER ENG MODELING M, P391, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-820644-7.00008-6, 10.1016/b978-0-12-820644-7.00008-6]
  • [10] Combined gamma and M-test-based ANN and ARIMA models for groundwater fluctuation forecasting in semiarid regions
    Choubin, Bahram
    Malekian, Arash
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2017, 76 (15)