Optimal local impedance parameters for successful pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation

被引:4
|
作者
Fukaya, Hidehira [1 ]
Mori, Hitoshi [2 ]
Oikawa, Jun [1 ]
Kawano, Daisuke [2 ]
Nakamura, Hironori [1 ]
Ishizue, Naruya [1 ]
Kishihara, Jun [1 ]
Hojo, Rintaro [3 ]
Tsutsui, Kenta [2 ]
Ikeda, Yoshifumi [2 ]
Kato, Ritsushi [2 ]
Fukamizu, Seiji [3 ]
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Sch Med, 1-15-1 Kitasato,Minami Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520374, Japan
[2] Saitama Med Univ Int Med Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Hidaka, Japan
[3] Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
atrial fibrillation; IntellaNav STABLEPOINT (TM); local impedance; pulmonary vein isolation; CATHETER ABLATION; PREDICTING STROKE;
D O I
10.1111/jce.15748
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Local impedance (LI) parameters of IntellaNav STABLEPOINT for successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) of atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to seek LI data achieving successful PVI. Methods: Consecutive AF patients who underwent catheter ablation with STABLEPOINT were prospectively enrolled in two centers. PVI was performed under a constant 35-or 40-watt power, 20-s duration, and > 5-g contact force. The operators were blinded to the LI data. The characteristics of all ablation points with/without conduction gaps (Unsuccess or Success tags) after the first-attempt PVI were evaluated for the right/left PVs and anterior/posterior wall (RPV/LPV and AW/PW, respectively), and cutoff values of LI data were calculated for successful lesion formation. Results: A total of 5257 ablation points in 102 patients (65 [58-72] years old, 65.7% male) were evaluated. The LI drop values were higher in the Success tags than Unsuccess tags on the LPV-AW and RPV-AW/PW (p < .001), except for the LPV-PW (p = .105). The %LI drop values (LI drop/initial LI) were higher for the Success tags in all areas (15.8 [12.2%-19.6%] vs. 11.6 [9.7%-15.6%] in LPV-AW: p < .001, 15.0 [11.5%-19.3%] vs. 11.4 [8.7%-17.3%] in LPV-PW: p = .035, 15.3 [11.5%-19.4%] vs. 9.9 [8.1%-13.7%] in RPV-AW: p < .001, and 13.3 [10.1%-17.4%] vs. 8.1 [6.3%-9.5%] in RPV-PW, p < .001). The LI drop and %LI drop cutoff values were 20.0 ohms and 11.6%, respectively. Conclusions: An insufficient LI drop with STABLEPOINT was associated with a gap formation during PVI, and the best cutoff values for the LI drop and %LI drop were 20.0 ohms and 11.6%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 81
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Visually guided pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
    Bordignon, Stefano
    Boehmer, Marie-Christine
    Klostermann, Annemarie
    Fuernkranz, Alexander
    Perrotta, Laura
    Dugo, Daniela
    Chun, K. R. Julian
    Schmidt, Boris
    EUROPACE, 2016, 18 (04): : 538 - 542
  • [22] Cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
    Kuehne, Michael
    Schaer, Beat
    Ammann, Peter
    Suter, Yves
    Osswald, Stefan
    Sticherling, Christian
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2010, 140 (15-16) : 214 - 221
  • [23] Outcome of Total Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
    Matsuo, Seiichiro
    Yamane, Teiichi
    Inada, Keiichi
    Shibayama, Kenri
    Miyanaga, Satoru
    Date, Taro
    Miyazaki, Hidekazu
    Sugimoto, Kenichi
    Mochizuki, Seibu
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2005, 21 (03) : 378 - 383
  • [24] Efficacy of Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
    Guhl, Emily N.
    Siddoway, Donald
    Adelstein, Evan
    Voigt, Andrew
    Saba, Samir
    Jain, Sandeep K.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (04) : 423 - 427
  • [25] Pulsed Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation
    Reddy, Vivek Y.
    Neuzil, Petr
    Koruth, Jacob S.
    Petru, Jan
    Funosako, Moritoshi
    Cochet, Hubert
    Sediva, Lucie
    Chovanec, Milan
    Dukkipati, Srinivas R.
    Jais, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (03) : 315 - 326
  • [26] Effect of preprocedural pharmacologic cardioversion on pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
    Okawa, Keisuke
    Hara, Shohei
    Morimoto, Takeshi
    Tsushima, Ryu
    Sudo, Yuya
    Sogo, Masahiro
    Ozaki, Masatomo
    Takahashi, Masahiko
    Doi, Masayuki
    Morita, Hiroshi
    Ito, Hiroshi
    HEART RHYTHM, 2021, 18 (09) : 1473 - 1479
  • [27] Autonomic cardiogastric neural interaction after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Yamada, Shinya
    Kaneshiro, Takashi
    Hijioka, Naoko
    Amami, Kazuaki
    Horikoshi, Yukiko
    Yamadera, Yukio
    Hikichi, Takuto
    Yoshihisa, Akiomi
    Takeishi, Yasuchika
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 65 (02) : 357 - 364
  • [28] Initial experience with the Mesh catheter for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
    Mansour, Moussa
    Forleo, Giovanni B.
    Pappalardo, Augusto
    Heist, E. Kevin
    Avella, Andrea
    Laurenzi, Francesco
    De Girolamo, Piergiuseppe
    Bencardino, Gianluigi
    Dello Russo, Antonio
    Mantica, Massimo
    Ruskin, Jeremy N.
    Tondo, Claudio
    HEART RHYTHM, 2008, 5 (11) : 1510 - 1516
  • [29] Acute pulmonary vein reconnection is a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation
    Anter, Elad
    Contreras-Valdes, Fernando M.
    Shvilkin, Alexei
    Tschabrunn, Cory M.
    Josephson, Mark E.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 39 (03) : 225 - 232
  • [30] Acute pulmonary vein reconnection is a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation
    Elad Anter
    Fernando M. Contreras-Valdes
    Alexei Shvilkin
    Cory M. Tschabrunn
    Mark E. Josephson
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2014, 39 : 225 - 232