Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial

被引:1
作者
Aulbach, Matthias Burkard [1 ,2 ]
van Alebeek, Hannah [1 ,2 ]
Kahveci, Sercan [1 ,2 ]
Blechert, Jens [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Paris Lodron Univ Salzburg, Dept Psychol, Salzburg, Austria
[2] Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Dept Psychol, Salzburg, Austria
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 04期
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Information technology; World Wide Web technology; NUTRITION & DIETETICS; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PUBLIC HEALTH; EATING BEHAVIOR; APPROACH/AVOIDANCE TENDENCIES; EXPLICIT MEASURES; WEIGHT-LOSS; FOOD CUES; IMPLICIT; CONSUMPTION; INHIBITION; VALIDATION; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070443
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Unhealthy eating behaviour is a major contributor to obesity and related diseases and is associated with a behavioural bias to approach rather than avoid desired foods, as measured with reaction time tasks. Approach-avoidance interventions (AAIs) have been proposed as a way to modify food evaluations and help people to eat in accordance with their dietary goals. Mobile implementations of AAI might be easily accessible, low threshold interventions, but their effectiveness has not been established yet. Methods and analysis Participants who aim to change their eating behaviour are randomised to intervention or control groups. They complete six sessions of a smartphone-based AAI, in which they push (ie, avoid) or pull (ie, approach) personalised food images. Intervention group participants always avoid foods that they personally want to eat less often and approach foods that they personally want to eat more often. In the control group, images are paired equally often with both response directions. To evaluate contextual and dynamic intervention effects, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is measured throughout, with questions about food intake, hunger, stress, emotions, eating intentions, food craving and impulsivity twice a day. Additional EMA preintervention and postintervention measures are administered before and after the intervention phase (4days each) with a 1-day follow-up EMA 4 weeks after the intervention. Multilevel models will examine the temporal covariance between approach bias and self-reported variables as well as short-term and long-term intervention effects on approach bias, food intake and craving. Ethics and dissemination The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Salzburg. Results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at scientific conferences. Trial registration number German Clinical Trials Register DRKS, registration number DRKS00030780.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
[61]   Mindless eating - The 200 daily food decisions we overlook [J].
Wansink, Brian ;
Sobal, Jeffery .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2007, 39 (01) :106-123
[62]   THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF FOOD CRAVINGS [J].
WEINGARTEN, HP ;
ELSTON, D .
APPETITE, 1990, 15 (03) :231-246
[63]   Validation of the UPPS impulsive behaviour scale: a four-factor model of impulsivity [J].
Whiteside, SP ;
Lynam, DR ;
Miller, JD ;
Reynolds, SK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2005, 19 (07) :559-574
[64]   ABC Training: A New Theory-Based Form of Cognitive-Bias Modification to Foster Automatization of Alternative Choices in the Treatment of Addiction and Related Disorders [J].
Wiers, Reinout W. ;
Van Dessel, Pieter ;
Kopetz, Catalina .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 29 (05) :499-505
[65]   Comparison of different response devices to assess behavioral tendencies towards chocolate in the approach-avoidance task [J].
Wittekind, Charlotte E. ;
Blechert, Jens ;
Schiebel, Tanja ;
Lender, Anja ;
Kahveci, Sercan ;
Kuehn, Simone .
APPETITE, 2021, 165
[66]  
World Health Organization, 2021, OB OV
[67]   Cognitive training on eating behaviour and weight loss: A meta-analysis and systematic review [J].
Yang, Yingkai ;
Shields, Grant S. ;
Wu, Qian ;
Liu, Yanling ;
Chen, Hong ;
Guo, Cheng .
OBESITY REVIEWS, 2019, 20 (11) :1628-1641
[68]  
Zech HG., 2022, PREPRINT, DOI [10.31234/osf.io/8wujr, DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/8WUJR]
[69]   Test-retest reliability of a smartphone-based approach-avoidance task: Effects of retest period, stimulus type, and demographics [J].
Zech, Hilmar G. ;
Gable, Philip ;
van Dijk, Wilco W. ;
van Dillen, Lotte F. .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2023, 55 (05) :2652-2668
[70]   A mobile approach-avoidance task [J].
Zech, Hilmar G. ;
Rotteveel, Mark ;
van Dijk, Wilco W. ;
van Dillen, Lotte F. .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2020, 52 (05) :2085-2097