Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial

被引:1
作者
Aulbach, Matthias Burkard [1 ,2 ]
van Alebeek, Hannah [1 ,2 ]
Kahveci, Sercan [1 ,2 ]
Blechert, Jens [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Paris Lodron Univ Salzburg, Dept Psychol, Salzburg, Austria
[2] Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Dept Psychol, Salzburg, Austria
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 04期
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Information technology; World Wide Web technology; NUTRITION & DIETETICS; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PUBLIC HEALTH; EATING BEHAVIOR; APPROACH/AVOIDANCE TENDENCIES; EXPLICIT MEASURES; WEIGHT-LOSS; FOOD CUES; IMPLICIT; CONSUMPTION; INHIBITION; VALIDATION; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070443
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Unhealthy eating behaviour is a major contributor to obesity and related diseases and is associated with a behavioural bias to approach rather than avoid desired foods, as measured with reaction time tasks. Approach-avoidance interventions (AAIs) have been proposed as a way to modify food evaluations and help people to eat in accordance with their dietary goals. Mobile implementations of AAI might be easily accessible, low threshold interventions, but their effectiveness has not been established yet. Methods and analysis Participants who aim to change their eating behaviour are randomised to intervention or control groups. They complete six sessions of a smartphone-based AAI, in which they push (ie, avoid) or pull (ie, approach) personalised food images. Intervention group participants always avoid foods that they personally want to eat less often and approach foods that they personally want to eat more often. In the control group, images are paired equally often with both response directions. To evaluate contextual and dynamic intervention effects, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is measured throughout, with questions about food intake, hunger, stress, emotions, eating intentions, food craving and impulsivity twice a day. Additional EMA preintervention and postintervention measures are administered before and after the intervention phase (4days each) with a 1-day follow-up EMA 4 weeks after the intervention. Multilevel models will examine the temporal covariance between approach bias and self-reported variables as well as short-term and long-term intervention effects on approach bias, food intake and craving. Ethics and dissemination The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Salzburg. Results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at scientific conferences. Trial registration number German Clinical Trials Register DRKS, registration number DRKS00030780.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Implicit process interventions in eating behaviour: a meta-analysis examining mediators and moderators [J].
Aulbach, Matthias B. ;
Knittle, Keegan ;
Haukkala, Ari .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2019, 13 (02) :179-208
[2]   App-based food Go/No-Go training: User engagement and dietary intake in an opportunistic observational study [J].
Aulbach, Matthias Burkard ;
Knittle, Keegan ;
van Beurden, Samantha Barbara ;
Haukkala, Ari ;
Lawrence, Natalia S. .
APPETITE, 2021, 165
[3]   Does approach bias modification really work in the eating domain? A commentary on Kakoschke et al. (2017) [J].
Becker, Daniela ;
Jostmann, Nils B. ;
Holland, Rob W. .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2018, 77 :293-294
[4]   Approach avoidance training in the eating domain: Testing the effectiveness across three single session studies [J].
Becker, Daniela ;
Jostmann, Nils B. ;
Wiers, Reinout W. ;
Holland, Rob W. .
APPETITE, 2015, 85 :58-65
[5]   Food-Pics_Extended-An Image Database for Experimental Research on Eating and Appetite: Additional Images, Normative Ratings and an Updated Review [J].
Blechert, Jens ;
Lender, Anja ;
Polk, Sarah ;
Busch, Niko A. ;
Ohla, Kathrin .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
[6]   Approach bias and cue reactivity towards food in people with high versus low levels of food craving [J].
Brockmeyer, Timo ;
Hahn, Carolyn ;
Reetz, Christina ;
Schmidt, Ulrike ;
Friederich, Hans-Christoph .
APPETITE, 2015, 95 :197-202
[7]   Measuring Implicit Approach-Avoidance Tendencies towards Food Using a Mobile Phone outside the Lab [J].
Brouwer, Anne-Marie ;
van Beers, Jasper J. ;
Sabu, Priya ;
Stuldreher, Ivo, V ;
Zech, Hilmar G. ;
Kaneko, Daisuke .
FOODS, 2021, 10 (07)
[8]   Implicit Bias Is Behavior: A Functional-Cognitive Perspective on Implicit Bias [J].
De Houwer, Jan .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (05) :835-840
[9]   The pulling power of chocolate: Effects of approach-avoidance training on approach bias and consumption [J].
Dickson, Hugh ;
Kavanagh, David J. ;
MacLeod, Colin .
APPETITE, 2016, 99 :46-51
[10]   Computerized neurocognitive training for improving dietary health and facilitating weight loss [J].
Forman, Evan M. ;
Manasse, Stephanie M. ;
Dallal, Diane H. ;
Crochiere, Rebecca. J. ;
Loyka, Caitlin M. ;
Butryn, Meghan L. ;
Juarascio, Adrienne S. ;
Houben, Katrijn .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 42 (06) :1029-1040