Quality, Understandability and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Skin Cancer Screening

被引:2
作者
Reinhardt, Lydia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Steeb, Theresa [4 ,5 ]
Mifka, Anika [4 ,5 ]
Berking, Carola [4 ,5 ]
Meier, Friedegund [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Dept Dermatol, Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Canc Ctr Dresden, Skin Canc Ctr, Dresden, Germany
[3] Natl Ctr Tumor Dis, Dresden, Germany
[4] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Dermatol, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Comprehens Canc Ctr Erlangen European Metropolitan, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
Skin cancer; Skin cancer screening; Internet; Videos; Health promotion; Shared decision-making; Patient information; Reliability; Quality; INFORMATION RESOURCES; MELANOMA PATIENTS; INTERNET; PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTION; SEEKING;
D O I
10.1007/s13187-023-02320-w
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In 2008, a nationwide skin cancer screening (SCS) program was implemented in Germany. However, participation rates remain low. YouTube videos on SCS might educate eligible persons to undergo SCS. Until now, no scientific evaluation of the quality of videos available for German-speaking persons eligible for SCS has been performed. Here, we identified and evaluated videos on SCS provided on YouTube. YouTube was searched in May 2022 for German terms related to SCS. Two authors evaluated the videos of the first three pages that met the predefined eligibility criteria. The quality of the videos ' information was evaluated using DISCERN and the Global Quality Scale (GQS). The understandability and actionability were assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). The reliability was assessed with the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) score. Subgroup differences were identified by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Overall, 38 videos were included in the evaluation. Most videos were provided by health professionals (clinics and practices). The average scores (mean (SD)) for the individual tools were as follows: DISCERN 3.1/5 points (+/- 0.52), GQS 3.72/5 points (+/- 0.7), understandability 64,27% (+/- 13.53%), actionability 58.22% (+/- 15.18%), JAMA 37.17% (+/- 18.94%). These results indicate a mediocre to good understandability, a mediocre quality and actionability, and a low reliability. Videos that were assessed as useful were of significantly better quality. An improvement of freely available informational videos on SCS, especially with regard to the reliability criteria, is urgently needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1667 / 1674
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ABT EP SOZ GES
[2]  
Augustin M, 2012, J DTSCH DERMATOL GES, V10, P42, DOI [10.1111/j.1610-0387.2011.07761_suppl.x, 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2011.07761.x]
[3]   A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the world wide web [J].
Bernard, Andre ;
Langille, Morgan ;
Hughes, Stephanie ;
Rose, Caren ;
Leddin, Desmond ;
van Zanten, Sander Veldhuyzen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (09) :2070-2077
[4]  
Brutting Julia, 2018, J Dtsch Dermatol Ges, V16, P1093, DOI 10.1111/ddg.13630_g
[5]   Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art [J].
Cline, RJW ;
Haynes, KM .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2001, 16 (06) :671-692
[6]   Cancer Patients and the Internet: a Survey Among German Cancer Patients [J].
Ebel, Marie-Desiree ;
Stellamanns, Jan ;
Keinki, Christian ;
Rudolph, Ivonne ;
Huebner, Jutta .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2017, 32 (03) :503-508
[7]  
Eissing L, 2017, HAUTARZT, V68, P371, DOI 10.1007/s00105-017-3943-2
[8]   Sifting Through It All: Characterizing Melanoma Patients' Utilization of the Internet as an Information Source [J].
Hamilton, Sarah Nicole ;
Scali, Elena P. ;
Yu, Irene ;
Gusnowski, Eva ;
Ingledew, Paris-Ann .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2015, 30 (03) :580-584
[9]  
Henkel M, 2012, BEDARF KREBSINFORMAT
[10]  
Jansen BJ, 2003, IC'03: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET COMPUTING, VOLS 1 AND 2, P65