Building capacity for socio-ecological change through the campus farm: a mixed-methods study

被引:3
作者
Williamson, Francesca A. [1 ]
Rollings, Amber J. [2 ]
Fore, Grant A. [3 ,4 ]
Angstmann, Julia L. [5 ]
Sorge, Brandon H. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Henry Jackson Fdn Adv Mil Med, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] IUPUI, STEM Educ Innovat & Res Inst, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] Univ Cape Town, Dept Anthropol, Cape Town, South Africa
[5] Butler Univ, Ctr Urban Ecol & Sustainabil, Indianapolis, IN 46208 USA
[6] IUPUI, Dept Technol Leadership & Commun, Indianapolis, IN USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Campus farms; place-based experiential learning; pro-environmentalism; sense of place; sustainability; PLACE ATTACHMENT; SUSTAINABILITY EDUCATION; ATTITUDE; INITIATIVES; CURRICULUM; FRAMEWORK; BEHAVIOR; SENSE;
D O I
10.1080/13504622.2022.2070604
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Given the ongoing socio-ecological crises, higher education institutions need curricular interventions to support students in developing the knowledge, skills, and perspectives needed to create a sustainable future. Campus farms are increasingly becoming sites for sustainability and environmental education toward this end. This paper describes the design and outcomes of a farm-situated place-based experiential learning (PBEL) intervention in two undergraduate biology courses and one environmental studies course over two academic years. We conducted a mixed-method study using pre/post-surveys and focus groups to examine the relationship between the PBEL intervention and students' sense of place and expressions of pro-environmentalism. The quantitative analysis indicated measurable shifts in students' place attachment and place-meaning scores. The qualitative findings illustrate a complex relationship between students' academic/career interests, backgrounds, and pro-environmentalism. We integrated these findings to generate a model of sustainability learning through PBEL and argue for deepening learning to encourage active participation in socio-ecological change.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 231
页数:20
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Adams K., 2015, RES METHODS STAT APP
  • [2] Angstmann J. L., 2019, J SUSTAINABILITY ED, V20, P114
  • [3] Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2010, SUSTAINABILITY CURRI
  • [4] Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets, and living Chicago as Indigenous land
    Bang, Megan
    Curley, Lawrence
    Kessel, Adam
    Marin, Ananda
    Suzukovich, Eli S., III
    Strack, George
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2014, 20 (01) : 37 - 55
  • [5] Bernard HR., 2006, Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches, V4th, P256
  • [6] The new environmental paradigm scale: Reassessing the operationalization of contemporary environmentalism
    Bernstein, Jennifer
    Szuster, Brian W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION, 2019, 50 (02) : 73 - 83
  • [7] Bingham A. J., 2021, Analyzing and interpreting qualitative data: After the interview, P133, DOI DOI 10.3102/1682697
  • [8] Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN SPORT EXERCISE AND HEALTH, 2019, 11 (04) : 589 - 597
  • [9] Burns H., 2011, J SUSTAINABILITY ED, V2
  • [10] Disrupting neoliberal discourse in critical sustainability education: a qualitative analysis of intentional language framing
    Cachelin, Adrienne
    Rose, Jeff
    Paisley, Karen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (08) : 1127 - 1142