Conspiracy theories in online environments: An interdisciplinary literature review and agenda for future research

被引:74
作者
Mahl, Daniela [1 ]
Schafer, Mike S. [2 ]
Zeng, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, IKMZ Dept Commun & Media Res, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, IKMZ Dept Commun & Media Res, Sci Commun, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Conspiracy theories; digital media; disinformation; misinformation; social media platforms; systematic literature review; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1177/14614448221075759
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Research on conspiracy theories in digital media has grown considerably in recent years. As a result, the field of research has become more multidisciplinary and diverse. To bridge disciplinary boundaries, identify foci of analysis and research gaps, this study provides an interdisciplinary systematic literature review (2007-2020), analyzing current research on conspiracy theorizing online, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Findings show that the majority of studies lack a definition of conspiracy theories and fail to conceptually delineate conspiracy theories from other forms of deceptive content. We also found that while the field employs a variety of methodological approaches, most studies have focused on individual, "mainstream" social media platforms, "Western" countries, English-language communication, and single conspiracy theories. We use the findings of our review to remedy conceptual and empirical shortcomings and to provide suggestions on how to move forward in research on conspiracy theories online.
引用
收藏
页码:1781 / 1801
页数:21
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Allington D, 2021, PSYCHOL MED, V51, P1763, DOI [10.1017/S003329172000224X, 10.1017/S0033291721000593]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Sociological Review
[3]   Conspiracy theories as stigmatized knowledge [J].
Barkun, Michael .
DIOGENES, 2015, 62 (3-4) :114-120
[4]   'Corona? 5G? or both?': the dynamics of COVID-19/5G conspiracy theories on Facebook [J].
Bruns, Axel ;
Harrington, Stephen ;
Hurcombe, Edward .
MEDIA INTERNATIONAL AUSTRALIA, 2020, 177 (01) :12-29
[5]   Bridging the great divide: Conspiracy theory research for the 21st century [J].
Butter, Michael ;
Knight, Peter .
DIOGENES, 2015, 62 (3-4) :17-29
[6]  
Choi BCK, 2006, CLIN INVEST MED, V29, P351
[7]   Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing [J].
Clarke, S .
PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2002, 32 (02) :131-150
[8]  
Davis DavidBrion., 1971, Fear of Conspiracy: Images of Un-American Subversion from the Revolution to the Present
[9]  
DeWitt D., 2018, Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, P319, DOI [DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780190844073.003.0021, 10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0021]
[10]   Understanding Conspiracy Theories [J].
Douglas, Karen M. ;
Uscinski, Joseph E. ;
Sutton, Robbie M. ;
Cichocka, Aleksandra ;
Nefes, Turkay ;
Ang, Chee Siang ;
Deravi, Farzin .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 40 :3-35