Becoming the change we want to see: Aspirations and initial progress with diversity, equity, access, and inclusion practices to create welcoming environments and center community in informal science institutions

被引:1
作者
Peterman, Karen [1 ]
Chesnut, Lynn [2 ]
Gathings, M. J. [1 ]
Martin, Keshia [1 ]
Maier, Allison Black [1 ]
Evia, Jane Robertson [3 ]
Chavez, Regina Ayala [1 ]
Harris, Maren [1 ]
Busch, K. C. [4 ]
Stover, Darrell [5 ]
Larson, Lincoln R. [6 ]
Stevenson, Kathryn [6 ]
Yelton, Charles [5 ]
机构
[1] Catalyst Consulting Grp, Durham, NC 27712 USA
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, Dept STEM Educ, Raleigh, NC USA
[5] North Carolina Museum Nat Sci, Raleigh, NC USA
[6] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Pk Recreat & Tourism Management, Raleigh, NC USA
关键词
community; DEAI; informal science institutions; welcoming; LOW-INCOME; PARTICIPATION; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1111/cura.12621
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study focuses on the diversity, equity, access, and inclusion (DEAI) practices of informal science institutions (ISI) that are part of a statewide grants program. Data were collected to understand how ISIs interpret and implement DEAI in thought and action in their efforts to create more welcoming spaces for members of communities that are often underrepresented or marginalized in informal learning spaces. Modeled after the Cultural Competence Learning Institute's (CCLI) Framework, survey data were collected to understand DEAI practices being used to create welcoming environments. Interview data were collected 2 years later to understand how ISIs collaborate with others to center communities in their work. Results indicated that while DEAI was considered a high priority, strategies were limited. A positive relationship was found between the number of strategies used and perceived success. ISIs' stories of collaboration focused most often on transactional relationships with organizational partners. Those working with communities directly collaborated in needs-based or reciprocal ways. Results are interpreted in relation to the CCLI Framework's potential to provide benchmarks for both individual institutions and groups like our statewide grants program to use as comparison points for their own DEAI practice.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 637
页数:21
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   IML495 Welcome to the Museum: Reflecting on Representation & Inclusion in Museum Evaluation [J].
Anderson, Alice ;
Mileham, Michelle A. .
CURATOR-THE MUSEUM JOURNAL, 2020, 63 (04) :597-603
[2]   Disorientating, fun or meaningful? Disadvantaged families' experiences of a science museum visit [J].
Archer, Louise ;
Dawson, Emily ;
Seakins, Amy ;
Wong, Billy .
CULTURAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2016, 11 (04) :917-939
[3]  
Bequette M., 2021, ORG APPROACHES SYSTE
[4]  
Bevan B., 2018, Dimensions, V20, P26
[5]   Broadening Perspectives on Broadening Participation: Professional Learning Tools for More Expansive and Equitable Science Communication [J].
Bevan, Bronwyn ;
Barton, Angela Calabrese ;
Garibay, Cecilia .
FRONTIERS IN COMMUNICATION, 2020, 5
[6]  
Bianchini J.A., 2017, SCI EDUC, P453
[7]  
Culture Track, 2022, RETHINKING RELEVANCE
[8]  
Culture Track, 2021, CULT COMM TIM TRANSF
[9]   Reimagining publics and (non) participation: Exploring exclusion from science communication through the experiences of low-income, minority ethnic groups [J].
Dawson, Emily .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2018, 27 (07) :772-786
[10]   "Not Designed for Us": How Science Museums and Science Centers Socially Exclude Low-Income, Minority Ethnic Groups [J].
Dawson, Emily .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2014, 98 (06) :981-1008