Concurrent validity of the ages and stages questionnaires with Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III at 2 years - Singapore cohort study

被引:7
作者
Agarwal, Pratibha Keshav [1 ]
Xie, Huichao [2 ]
Rema, Anu Sathyan Sathyapalan [3 ]
Meaney, Michael J. [4 ]
Godfrey, Keith M. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Rajadurai, Victor Samuel [8 ]
Daniel, Lourdes Mary [1 ]
机构
[1] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Child Dev, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Psychol & Child & Human Dev, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore, Singapore
[3] ASTAR, Singapore, Singapore
[4] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Southampton, MRC Life Course Epidemiol Ctr, Southampton, England
[6] Univ Southampton, NIHR Southampton Biomed Res Ctr, Southampton, England
[7] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Southampton, England
[8] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp Singapore, Dept Neonatol, Singapore, Singapore
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
ASQ-3; Bayley-III; cohort study; developmental screening; validity; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.03.013
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: With increasing acceptance of universal developmental screening in primary care, it is essential to evaluate the local validity and psychometric properties of commonly used questionnaires like the parent-completed Ages and Stages Questionnaires, 3rd Edition (ASQ-3) in identifying developmental delays. The aim of this study is to assess the convergent validity of the ASQ-3 with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-3rd edition (Bayley-III) in identifying developmental delay in a low-risk term cohort in Singapore. Methods: ASQ-3 and Bayley-III data was collected prospectively with generation of ASQ-3 cut-off scores using three different criteria: 1-standard deviation (SD) (Criterion-I) or 2-SD (Criterion-II) below the mean, and using a Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) (Criterion-III). Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated. Correlations between the ASQ-3 and Bayley-III domains were evaluated using Pearson coefficients. Results: With all three criteria across different domains ASQ-3 showed high specificity (72-99%) and NPV (69-98%), but lower sensitivity (19-74%) and PPV (11-59%). Criterion-I identified 11-21% of children as "at-risk of developmental delay," and was the most promising criterion measure, with high specificity (82-91%), NPV (69-74%) and overall agreement of 64-71%. Moderate-strong correlations were seen between ASQ-3 Communication and Bayley-III Language scales (r = 0.44-0.59, p < 0.01). The lowest sensitivities were seen in the motor domains. Conclusions: ASQ-3 is reliable in low-risk settings in identifying typically developing children not at risk of developmental delay, but it has modest sensitivity. Moderate-strong correlations seen in the communication domain are clinically important for early identification of language delay, which is one of the most prevalent areas of early childhood developmental delay. Copyright (c) 2024, Taiwan Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 54
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   Developmental surveillance of infants and young children in pediatric primary care [J].
King, TM ;
Glascoe, FP .
CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2003, 15 (06) :624-629
[12]   Using the ages and stages questionnaire in the general population as a measure for identifying children not at risk of a neurodevelopmental disorder [J].
Lamsal, Ramesh ;
Dutton, Daniel J. ;
Zwicker, Jennifer D. .
BMC PEDIATRICS, 2018, 18
[13]   Promoting Optimal Development: Identifying Infants and Young Children With Developmental Disorders Through Developmental Surveillance and Screening [J].
Lipkin, Paul H. ;
Macias, Michelle M. ;
Kuo, Dennis Z. ;
Apkon, Susan ;
Davidson, Lynn F. ;
Ellerbeck, Kathryn A. ;
Foster, Jessica E. A. ;
Hyman, Susan L. ;
Noritz, Garey H. ;
Leppert, Mary O'Connor ;
Saunders, Barbara S. ;
Stille, Christopher ;
Yin, Larry ;
Weitzman, Carol C. ;
Childers, David Omer, Jr. ;
Levine, Jack M. ;
Peralta-Carcelen, Myriam ;
Poon, Jennifer K. ;
Smith, Peter J. ;
Blum, Nathan Jon ;
Takayama, John Ichiro ;
Baum, Rebecca ;
Voigt, Robert G. ;
Bridgemohan, Carolyn .
PEDIATRICS, 2020, 145 (01)
[14]  
McLean K., 2014, Screening and surveillance in early childhood health: Rapid review of evidence for effectiveness and efficiency of models
[15]  
Moore T.G., 2013, Acting early, changing lives: How prevention and early action saves money and improves well-being
[16]   Validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in Term and Preterm Infants [J].
Schonhaut, Luisa ;
Armijo, Ivan ;
Schoenstedt, Marianne ;
Alvarez, Jorge ;
Cordero, Miguel .
PEDIATRICS, 2013, 131 (05) :E1468-E1474
[17]   Comparative Accuracy of Developmental Screening Questionnaires [J].
Sheldrick, R. Christopher ;
Marakovitz, Susan ;
Garfinkel, Daryl ;
Carter, Alice S. ;
Perrin, Ellen C. .
JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2020, 174 (04) :366-374
[18]   Building a New Biodevelopmental Framework to Guide the Future of Early Childhood Policy [J].
Shonkoff, Jack P. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 81 (01) :357-367
[19]   Cohort Profile: Growing Up in Singapore Towards healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) birth cohort study [J].
Soh, Shu-E ;
Tint, Mya Thway ;
Gluckman, Peter D. ;
Godfrey, Keith M. ;
Rifkin-Graboi, Anne ;
Chan, Yiong Huak ;
Stuenkel, Walter ;
Holbrook, Joanna D. ;
Kwek, Kenneth ;
Chong, Yap-Seng ;
Saw, Seang Mei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 43 (05) :1401-1409
[20]  
Squires J., 2009, Ages & stages questionnaires