Concurrent validity of the ages and stages questionnaires with Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III at 2 years - Singapore cohort study

被引:7
作者
Agarwal, Pratibha Keshav [1 ]
Xie, Huichao [2 ]
Rema, Anu Sathyan Sathyapalan [3 ]
Meaney, Michael J. [4 ]
Godfrey, Keith M. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Rajadurai, Victor Samuel [8 ]
Daniel, Lourdes Mary [1 ]
机构
[1] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Child Dev, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Psychol & Child & Human Dev, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore, Singapore
[3] ASTAR, Singapore, Singapore
[4] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Southampton, MRC Life Course Epidemiol Ctr, Southampton, England
[6] Univ Southampton, NIHR Southampton Biomed Res Ctr, Southampton, England
[7] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Southampton, England
[8] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp Singapore, Dept Neonatol, Singapore, Singapore
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
ASQ-3; Bayley-III; cohort study; developmental screening; validity; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.03.013
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: With increasing acceptance of universal developmental screening in primary care, it is essential to evaluate the local validity and psychometric properties of commonly used questionnaires like the parent-completed Ages and Stages Questionnaires, 3rd Edition (ASQ-3) in identifying developmental delays. The aim of this study is to assess the convergent validity of the ASQ-3 with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-3rd edition (Bayley-III) in identifying developmental delay in a low-risk term cohort in Singapore. Methods: ASQ-3 and Bayley-III data was collected prospectively with generation of ASQ-3 cut-off scores using three different criteria: 1-standard deviation (SD) (Criterion-I) or 2-SD (Criterion-II) below the mean, and using a Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) (Criterion-III). Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated. Correlations between the ASQ-3 and Bayley-III domains were evaluated using Pearson coefficients. Results: With all three criteria across different domains ASQ-3 showed high specificity (72-99%) and NPV (69-98%), but lower sensitivity (19-74%) and PPV (11-59%). Criterion-I identified 11-21% of children as "at-risk of developmental delay," and was the most promising criterion measure, with high specificity (82-91%), NPV (69-74%) and overall agreement of 64-71%. Moderate-strong correlations were seen between ASQ-3 Communication and Bayley-III Language scales (r = 0.44-0.59, p < 0.01). The lowest sensitivities were seen in the motor domains. Conclusions: ASQ-3 is reliable in low-risk settings in identifying typically developing children not at risk of developmental delay, but it has modest sensitivity. Moderate-strong correlations seen in the communication domain are clinically important for early identification of language delay, which is one of the most prevalent areas of early childhood developmental delay. Copyright (c) 2024, Taiwan Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 54
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Prospective evaluation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd Edition in very-low-birthweight infants [J].
Agarwal, Pratibha K. ;
Shi, Luming ;
Daniel, Lourdes M. ;
Yang, Phey Hong ;
Khoo, Poh Choo ;
Quek, Bin Huey ;
Zheng, Qishi ;
Rajadurai, Victor S. .
DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2017, 59 (05) :484-489
[2]   Evaluation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ 3) as a developmental screener at 9, 18, and 24 months [J].
Agarwal, Pratibha Keshav ;
Xie, Huichao ;
Rema, Anu Sathyan Sathyapalan ;
Rajadurai, Victor Samuel ;
Lim, Sok Bee ;
Meaney, Michael ;
Daniel, Lourdes Mary .
EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 147
[3]  
BAYLEY N, 1993, BAYLEY SCALES INFANT
[4]   Developmental assessment of children [J].
Bellman, Martin ;
Byrne, Orlaith ;
Sege, Robert .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
[5]  
Berkman N.D., 2015, Screening for Speech and Language Delays and Disorders in Children Age 5 Years or Younger
[6]   Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course [J].
Black, Maureen M. ;
Walker, Susan P. ;
Fernald, Lia C. H. ;
Andersen, Christopher T. ;
DiGirolamo, Ann M. ;
Lu, Chunling ;
McCoy, Dana C. ;
Fink, Guenther ;
Shawar, Yusra R. ;
Shiffman, Jeremy ;
Devercelli, Amanda E. ;
Wodon, Quentin T. ;
Vargas-Baron, Emily ;
Grantham-McGregor, Sally .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10064) :77-90
[7]   Trends in the Prevalence of Developmental Disabilities in US Children, 1997-2008 [J].
Boyle, Coleen A. ;
Boulet, Sheree ;
Schieve, Laura A. ;
Cohen, Robin A. ;
Blumberg, Stephen J. ;
Yeargin-Allsopp, Marshalyn ;
Visser, Susanna ;
Kogan, Michael D. .
PEDIATRICS, 2011, 127 (06) :1034-1042
[8]   Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: An algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening [J].
Duby, John C. ;
Lipkin, Paul H. ;
Macias, Michelle M. ;
Wegner, Lynn M. ;
Duncan, Paula ;
Hagan, Joseph F., Jr. ;
Cooley, W. Carl ;
Swigonski, Nancy .
PEDIATRICS, 2006, 118 (01) :405-420
[9]  
GHS, 2015, Online archive of general household survey
[10]   An economic analysis of developmental detection methods [J].
Glascoe, FP ;
Foster, EM ;
Wolraich, ML .
PEDIATRICS, 1997, 99 (06) :830-837