Clinical, radiographic, and histological/histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus grafting with deproteinized porcine or bovine bone mineral: A randomized clinical trial

被引:4
|
作者
Krennmair, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Postl, Lukas [1 ,2 ]
Schwarze, Uwe Yacine [3 ,4 ]
Malek, Michael [1 ]
Stimmelmayr, Michal [5 ]
Krennmair, Gerald [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Kepler Univ JKU Linz, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Keplerklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
[2] Ludwig Maximilian Univ LMU, NumBiolab Res Associate, Munich, Germany
[3] Med Univ Graz, Div Oral Surg & Orthodont, Graz, Austria
[4] Med Univ Graz, Musculoskeletal Res Unit Biomat, Graz, Austria
[5] Ludwig Maximilian Univ LMU, Dept Prosthodont, Munich, Germany
[6] Sigmund Freud Med Univ Vienna, Dent Sch, Dept Prosthodont, Vienna, Austria
[7] Sigmund Freud Med Univ Vienna, Dent Sch, Dept Prosthodont, 4600 Wels,Auwaldstr 5, A-4600 Vienna, Austria
关键词
biomaterials; bone regeneration; bone substitutes; guided tissue regeneration; PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES; AUTOGENOUS BONE; FLOOR AUGMENTATION; AUTOLOGOUS BONE; PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION; DIFFERENT RATIOS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FOLLOW-UP; BIO-OSS; SUBSTITUTES;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14164
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: The present study aimed to compare histomorphometrically evaluated new bone formation, radiographically measured graft stability, and clinical implant outcome between maxillary sinus grafting with either deproteinized porcine bone mineral (DPBM) or deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM). Materials and Methods: Thirty maxillary sinuses were initially included and randomly assigned to the test group (TG; DPBM, n = 15) or control group (CG; DBBM, n = 15). After a healing period (6 months), axially retrieved bone biopsies of the molar region were used for histological/histomorphometric analysis of new bone formations. Additionally, radiographically measured graft stability and clinical implant outcome were assessed. Results: Twenty-three sinus sites with 10 sinuses of the TG and 13 of the CG were ultimately available for data and statistical analysis. In the TG, a slightly, but yet significantly (p = .040) higher proportion of new bone formation (TG: 27.7 +/- 5.6% vs. CG: 22.9 +/- 5.1%) and a lesser (p = .019) amount of connective (non-mineralized) tissue ( TG: 47.5 +/- 9.5% vs. CG: 56.1 +/- 9.5%) was found than in the CG. However, both xenografts showed comparable (n.s.) residual bone graft (TG: 23.7 +/- 7.2% vs. CG: 21.1 +/- 9.85.6%), bone-to-graft contacts (TG: 26.2 +/- 9.8% vs. CG: 30.8 +/- 13.8%), similar graft height reduction over time (TG: 12.9 +/- 6.7% CG: 12.4 +/- 5.8%) and implant survival/success rate (100%). At the 3-year post-loading evaluation, the peri-implant marginal bone loss (TG: 0.52 +/- 0.19 mm; CG: 0.48 +/- 0.15 mm) and the peri-implant health conditions (TG: 87.5%/CG: 81.2%) did not differ between implants inserted in both xenografts used. Conclusions: The use of DPBM or DBBM for maxillary sinus augmentation is associated with comparable bone formation providing stable graft dimension combined with healthy peri-implant conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1247
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized Clinical Trial of Maxillary Sinus Grafting using Deproteinized Porcine and Bovine Bone Mineral
    Lee, Jung-Seok
    Shin, Hyun-Ki
    Yun, Jeong-Ho
    Cho, Kyoo-Sung
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (01) : 140 - 150
  • [2] Maxillary sinus floor elevation and grafting with deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a clinical and histomorphometric study
    Lee, Derrick Z.
    Chen, Stephen T.
    Darby, Ivan B.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (08) : 918 - 924
  • [3] Sinus Floor Elevation with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate or Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral: Clinical and Histomorphometric Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Kraus, Riccardo D.
    Stricker, Andres
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Jung, Ronald E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (05) : 1005 - 1012
  • [4] Histologic analysis following grafting of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine or porcine bone mineral: A randomized clinical trial
    Koo, Tae-Hwan
    Song, Young Woo
    Cha, Jae-Kook
    Jung, Ui-Won
    Kim, Chang-Sung
    Lee, Jung-Seok
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (01) : 93 - 102
  • [5] Radiographic and histological evaluation of deproteinized bovine bone mineral vs. deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in ridge preservation. A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Nart, Jose
    Barallat, Lucia
    Jimenez, Daniel
    Mestres, Jaume
    Gomez, Alberto
    Angel Carrasco, Miguel
    Violant, Deborah
    Ruiz-Magaz, Vanessa
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (07) : 840 - 848
  • [6] Maxillary Sinus Grafting With Biphasic Bone Ceramic or Autogenous Bone: Clinical, Histologic, and Histomorphometric Results From a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Danesh-Sani, Seyed A.
    Wallace, Stephen S.
    Movahed, Ali
    El Chaar, Edgard S.
    Cho, Sang-Choon
    Khouly, Ismael
    Testori, Tiziano
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (05) : 588 - 593
  • [7] A randomized clinical trial evaluating maxillary sinus augmentation with different particle sizes of demineralized bovine bone mineral: histological and immunohistochemical analysis
    de Molon, R. S.
    Magalhaes-Tunes, F. S.
    Semedo, C. V.
    Furlan, R. G.
    de Souza, L. G. L.
    de Souza Faloni, A. P.
    Marcantonio, E., Jr.
    Faeda, R. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 48 (06) : 810 - 823
  • [8] The impact of deproteinized bovine bone particle size on histological and clinical bone healing outcomes in the augmented sinus: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Kamolratanakul, Paksinee
    Mattheos, Nikos
    Yodsanga, Somchai
    Jansisyanont, Pornchai
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (03) : 361 - 371
  • [10] A histomorphometric assessment of collagen-stabilized anorganic bovine bone mineral in maxillary sinus augmentation - a prospective clinical trial
    Alayan, Jamil
    Vaquette, Cedryck
    Farah, Camile
    Ivanovski, Saso
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (07) : 850 - 858