共 50 条
Clinical, radiographic, and histological/histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus grafting with deproteinized porcine or bovine bone mineral: A randomized clinical trial
被引:4
|作者:
Krennmair, Stefan
[1
,2
]
Postl, Lukas
[1
,2
]
Schwarze, Uwe Yacine
[3
,4
]
Malek, Michael
[1
]
Stimmelmayr, Michal
[5
]
Krennmair, Gerald
[6
,7
]
机构:
[1] Johannes Kepler Univ JKU Linz, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Keplerklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
[2] Ludwig Maximilian Univ LMU, NumBiolab Res Associate, Munich, Germany
[3] Med Univ Graz, Div Oral Surg & Orthodont, Graz, Austria
[4] Med Univ Graz, Musculoskeletal Res Unit Biomat, Graz, Austria
[5] Ludwig Maximilian Univ LMU, Dept Prosthodont, Munich, Germany
[6] Sigmund Freud Med Univ Vienna, Dent Sch, Dept Prosthodont, Vienna, Austria
[7] Sigmund Freud Med Univ Vienna, Dent Sch, Dept Prosthodont, 4600 Wels,Auwaldstr 5, A-4600 Vienna, Austria
关键词:
biomaterials;
bone regeneration;
bone substitutes;
guided tissue regeneration;
PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES;
AUTOGENOUS BONE;
FLOOR AUGMENTATION;
AUTOLOGOUS BONE;
PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION;
DIFFERENT RATIOS;
DENTAL IMPLANTS;
FOLLOW-UP;
BIO-OSS;
SUBSTITUTES;
D O I:
10.1111/clr.14164
中图分类号:
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号:
1003 ;
摘要:
Objective: The present study aimed to compare histomorphometrically evaluated new bone formation, radiographically measured graft stability, and clinical implant outcome between maxillary sinus grafting with either deproteinized porcine bone mineral (DPBM) or deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM). Materials and Methods: Thirty maxillary sinuses were initially included and randomly assigned to the test group (TG; DPBM, n = 15) or control group (CG; DBBM, n = 15). After a healing period (6 months), axially retrieved bone biopsies of the molar region were used for histological/histomorphometric analysis of new bone formations. Additionally, radiographically measured graft stability and clinical implant outcome were assessed. Results: Twenty-three sinus sites with 10 sinuses of the TG and 13 of the CG were ultimately available for data and statistical analysis. In the TG, a slightly, but yet significantly (p = .040) higher proportion of new bone formation (TG: 27.7 +/- 5.6% vs. CG: 22.9 +/- 5.1%) and a lesser (p = .019) amount of connective (non-mineralized) tissue ( TG: 47.5 +/- 9.5% vs. CG: 56.1 +/- 9.5%) was found than in the CG. However, both xenografts showed comparable (n.s.) residual bone graft (TG: 23.7 +/- 7.2% vs. CG: 21.1 +/- 9.85.6%), bone-to-graft contacts (TG: 26.2 +/- 9.8% vs. CG: 30.8 +/- 13.8%), similar graft height reduction over time (TG: 12.9 +/- 6.7% CG: 12.4 +/- 5.8%) and implant survival/success rate (100%). At the 3-year post-loading evaluation, the peri-implant marginal bone loss (TG: 0.52 +/- 0.19 mm; CG: 0.48 +/- 0.15 mm) and the peri-implant health conditions (TG: 87.5%/CG: 81.2%) did not differ between implants inserted in both xenografts used. Conclusions: The use of DPBM or DBBM for maxillary sinus augmentation is associated with comparable bone formation providing stable graft dimension combined with healthy peri-implant conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1247
页数:18
相关论文