Not all stakeholders are equal: Corporate social responsibility variability and corporate financial performance

被引:10
作者
Gao, Yongqiang [1 ,3 ]
Nie, Yumeng [1 ]
Hafsi, Taieb [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Montreal, HEC, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
来源
BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY | 2023年 / 32卷 / 04期
关键词
corporate financial performance; corporate social responsibility; firm state ownership; media coverage; stakeholder theory; FIRM PERFORMANCE; EMPIRICAL-EXAMINATION; CROSS-SECTION; CEO TENURE; PHILANTHROPY; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; ENTERPRISE; GUANXI; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1111/beer.12576
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The advocates of "doing well by doing good" have advised firms to invest in corporate social responsibility (CSR), but firms may get lost on how to invest their limited resources in it since CSR is a complex concept involving many activities and different types of stakeholders. In this work, we draw upon the perspective of stakeholder saliency and the stakeholder resource-based view (SRBV) to propose that stakeholders may have different levels of expectations for CSR and contribute to firm value creation differently. Therefore, firms using different CSR to treat different stakeholders (high CSR variability) will have better financial performance. We further propose that context, in particular media coverage and state ownership, moderates the relationship between CSR variability and firm performance, as stakeholders of highly visible firms and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) may frown upon a discriminate treatment in CSR. Findings based on a sample of 3313 publicly listed firms and 15,324 firm-year observations in China's stock markets during the 2010-2018 period provide good support for our predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:1389 / 1410
页数:22
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]   Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values [J].
Agle, BR ;
Mitchell, RK ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :507-525
[2]   Corporate governance and social responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US [J].
Aguilera, RV ;
Williams, CA ;
Conley, JM ;
Rupp, DE .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2006, 14 (03) :147-158
[3]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[4]   CSR discrepancies, firm visibility and performance: a mediated moderation analysis [J].
Al-Shammari, Marwan A. ;
Al-Shammari, Hussam ;
Banerjee, Soumendra Nath .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2022, 60 (06) :1560-1584
[5]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[6]  
AUPPERLE KE, 1985, ACAD MANAGE J, V28, P446, DOI 10.5465/256210
[7]   On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance [J].
Awaysheh, Amrou ;
Heron, Randall A. ;
Perry, Tod ;
Wilson, Jared I. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (06) :965-987
[8]   Does it pay to be really good? addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance [J].
Barnett, Michael L. ;
Salomon, Robert M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (11) :1304-1320
[9]   Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility [J].
Barnett, Michael L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :794-816
[10]   Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance [J].
Barnett, Michael L. ;
Salomon, Robert M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (11) :1101-1122