Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement as a bridge to cholecystectomy for grade III acute cholecystitis: A national analysis

被引:0
作者
Curry, Joanna [1 ]
Chervu, Nikhil [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Nam Yong [1 ]
Hadaya, Joseph [1 ,2 ]
Vadlakonda, Amulya [1 ]
Kim, Shineui [1 ]
Keeley, Jessica [3 ]
Benharash, Peyman [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Cardiovasc Outcomes Res Labs CORELAB, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Torrance, CA USA
[4] UCLA Ctr Hlth Sci, 10833 Le Conte Ave,Room 62-249, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Percutaneous cholecystostomy; Cholecystectomy; Outcomes; Resource utilization; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; SUPERIOR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.sopen.2024.01.006
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCT) is an alternative to cholecystectomy (CCY) in high-risk surgical candidates with severe acute cholecystitis. A subset of these patients ultimately undergo delayed CCY. We therefore compared outcomes of delayed CCY in patients with grade III acute cholecystitis who received a PCT on index admission, to those who did not. Methods: Non-elective adult hospitalizations for grade III acute cholecystitis that underwent delayed CCY were identified in the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmission Database. Patients who received a PCT during their index admission comprised the PCT group (others: Non-PCT). Outcomes were assessed for the CCY hospitalization. Entropy balancing was used to generate sample weights to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Regression models were created to evaluate the association between PCT and the outcomes of interest. Results: Of an estimated 13,782 patients, 13.3 % comprised PCT. Compared to Non-PCT, PCT were older (71.1 +/- 13.1 vs 67.4 +/- 15.3 years) and more commonly in the highest income quartile (22.5 vs 16.1 %, both p < 0.001). After risk adjustment, PCT was associated with reduced odds of respiratory (AOR 0.67, CI 0.54-0.83) and infectious (AOR 0.77, CI 0.62-0.96) complications after eventual CCY. Finally, PCT had comparable pLOS (beta +0.31, CI [-0.14, 0.77]) and operative hospitalization costs (beta $800, CI [-2300, +600]). Conclusion: In the present study, PCT was associated with decreased odds of perioperative complications and comparable resource utilization upon readmission CCY. Our findings suggest that PCT may be helpful in bridging patients with grade III acute cholecystitis to eventual CCY.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 10
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Finding the Most Favorable Timing for Cholecystectomy after Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: An Analysis of Institutional and National Data
    Woodward, Steven G.
    Rios-Diaz, Arturo J.
    Zheng, Richard
    McPartland, Connor
    Tholey, Renee
    Tatarian, Talar
    Palazzo, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 232 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [22] Early cholecystectomy (≤ 8 weeks) following percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement is associated with higher morbidity
    Altieri, Maria S.
    Yang, Jie
    Yin, Donglei
    Brunt, L. Michael
    Talamini, Mark A.
    Pryor, Aurora D.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (07): : 3057 - 3063
  • [23] Utilization and Outcomes of Cholecystostomy and Cholecystectomy in Patients Admitted With Acute Cholecystitis: A Nationwide Analysis
    Wadhwa, Vibhor
    Trivedi, Premal S.
    Makary, Mina S.
    Strain, David, V
    Ahmed, Osman
    Chick, Jeffrey Forris Beecham
    Charalel, Resmi A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (06) : 1558 - 1565
  • [24] Cholecystostomy as Bridge to Surgery and as Definitive Treatment or Acute Cholecystectomy in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis
    Popowicz, Agnieszka
    Lundell, Lars
    Gerber, Peter
    Gustafsson, Ulf
    Pieniowski, Emil
    Sinabulya, Helen
    Sjodahl, Krister
    Tsekrekos, Andrianos
    Sandblom, Gabriel
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 2016
  • [25] Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube for Acute Cholecystitis: Quantifying Outcomes and Prognosis
    Huang, Raymond
    Patel, Deven C.
    Kallini, Joseph R.
    Wachsman, Ashley M.
    Van Allan, Richard J.
    Margulies, Daniel R.
    Phillips, Edward H.
    Barmparas, Galinos
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 270 : 405 - 412
  • [26] The Treatment of Critically III Patients With Acute Cholecystitis A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Percutaneous Cholecystostomy and Cholecystectomy
    Ambe, Peter C.
    Kaptanis, Sarantos
    Papadakis, Marios
    Weber, Sebastian A.
    Jansen, Stefan
    Zirngibl, Hubert
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 113 (33-34): : 545 - +
  • [27] Percutaneous Cholecystostomy is an Effective Definitive Treatment Option for Acute Acalculous Cholecystitis
    Kirkegard, J.
    Horn, T.
    Christensen, S. D.
    Larsen, L. P.
    Knudsen, A. R.
    Mortensen, F. V.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 104 (04) : 238 - 243
  • [28] Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube Placement for Treatment of Acute Calculous Cholecystitis
    Alvino, Donna Marie L.
    Ven Fong, Zhi
    McCarthy, Colin J.
    Velmahos, George
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Mueller, Peter R.
    Fagenholz, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2017, 21 (05) : 761 - 769
  • [29] Successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement
    Khasawneh, Mohammad A.
    Shamp, Andrea
    Heller, Stephanie
    Zielinski, Martin D.
    Jenkins, Donald H.
    Osborn, John B.
    Morris, David S.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2015, 78 (01) : 100 - 104
  • [30] Clinical and Survival Outcomes Using Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube Alone or Subsequent Interval Cholecystectomy to Treat Acute Cholecystitis
    Fleming, Christina A.
    Ismail, M.
    Kavanagh, R. G.
    Heneghan, H. M.
    Prichard, R. S.
    Geoghegan, J.
    Brophy, D. P.
    McDermott, E. W.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2020, 24 (03) : 627 - 632