Modeling unit non-response and validity of online teaching evaluation in higher education using generalizability theory approach

被引:15
作者
Dzakadzie, Yayra [1 ]
Quansah, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Educ, Dept Educ Fdn, Winneba, Ghana
关键词
evaluation; teaching quality; non-response; validity; generalizability theory (GT); reliability; STUDENT EVALUATION; BIAS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202896
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
IntroductionUnit non-response is a common phenomenon in online teaching evaluation in higher education institutions. However, little is known about the relationship between the rates of unit non-response and the quality of online teaching evaluation exercise. This study explored the incidence of unit non-response and how this phenomenon relates to the reliability of students' responses to online teaching evaluation.MethodsAdopting the generalizability theory approach, students' evaluation of teaching data from a university in Ghana was analyzed by conducting both generalizability study (G-study)- and decision study (D-study) analyses.ResultsThe results revealed that unit non-response among students was predominant in online teaching evaluation exercise. The study demonstrated that higher rates of non-response among students were associated with high levels of measurement errors and low reliability of responses.DiscussionThe findings of this study have implications for the accuracy of online evaluation data obtained for decision-making in higher education contexts. The study calls on higher education administrators to embark on sensitization and awareness campaigns that target students on the need to actively participate in the appraisal of teaching at the university to address the issue of unit non-response.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Abusamhadana G.A.O., 2021, ASIA PACIFIC J INFOR, V10, P124, DOI DOI 10.17576/APJITM-2021-1001-11
[2]   Nonresponse and Online Student Evaluations of Teaching: Understanding the Influence of Salience, Fatigue, and Academic Environments [J].
Adams, Meredith J. D. ;
Umbach, Paul D. .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 53 (05) :576-591
[4]  
Agormedah EK., 2020, J EDUC TECHNOL ONLIN, V3, P183, DOI [10.3126/kumj.v18i2.32943, DOI 10.31681/JETOL.726441, 10.31681/jetol.726441]
[5]  
Alharby E.R., 2006, A comparison between two scoring methods, holistic vs. analytic, using two measurement models, the generalizability theory and the many-facet Rasch measurement
[6]  
Allal L., 1997, Educational research methodology and measurement an international handbook, V2nd, P734
[7]  
Ankoma-Sey V. R., 2022, Handbook of research on distance education in Ghana, P42
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Missing data. quantitative applications in the social sciences
[9]   Electronic course evaluations: Does an Online delivery system influence student evaluations? [J].
Avery, RJ ;
Bryant, WK ;
Mathios, A ;
Kang, HJ ;
Bell, D .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2006, 37 (01) :21-37
[10]  
Bacon D.R., 2016, Marketing Education Review, V26, P93, DOI [10.1080/10528008.2016.1166442, DOI 10.1080/10528008.2016.1166442]