Fast computation of cluster validity measures for bregman divergences and benefits

被引:4
作者
Capo, Marco [1 ]
Perez, Aritz [1 ]
Lozano, Jose A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Basque Ctr Appl Math, Bilbao 48009, Spain
[2] Univ Basque Country, Dept Comp Sci & Artifitial Intelligence, Intelligent Syst Grp, UPV EHU, San Sebastian 20018, Spain
关键词
Partitional clustering; Number of clusters; Silhouette index; Davies-Bouldin; Calinski-Harabasz; Bregman divergences;
D O I
10.1016/j.patrec.2023.05.001
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Partitional clustering is one of the most relevant unsupervised learning and pattern recognition tech-niques. Unfortunately, one of the main drawbacks of these methodologies refer to the fact that the num-ber of clusters is generally assumed to be known beforehand and automating its selection is not straight-forward. On the same token, internal validity measures, such as the Silhouette index, Davies-Bouldin and Caliski-Harabasz measures have emerged as the standard techniques to be used when comparing the goodness of clustering results obtained via different clustering methods. These measures take into con-sideration both the inter and intra-cluster simmilarities and can be adapted to different metrics. Unfortu-nately, their used has been hindered due to their large computational complexities, which are commonly quadratic with respect to the number of instances of the data set. In this work, we show that the time complexity of computing the most popular internal validity measures can be utterly reduced by making used of the within-cluster errors and different properties of the Bregman divergences. This contribution ultimately allows us to massively speed-up the selection of an adequate number of clusters for a given data set as verified with extensive empirical comparisons.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 105
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Aggarwal CC, 2014, CH CRC DATA MIN KNOW, P1
  • [2] NP-hardness of Euclidean sum-of-squares clustering
    Aloise, Daniel
    Deshpande, Amit
    Hansen, Pierre
    Popat, Preyas
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2009, 75 (02) : 245 - 248
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, 2010 IEEE INT C DATA, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICDM.2010.35
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, CLUSTER ANAL
  • [5] An extensive comparative study of cluster validity indices
    Arbelaitz, Olatz
    Gurrutxaga, Ibai
    Muguerza, Javier
    Perez, Jesus M.
    Perona, Inigo
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2013, 46 (01) : 243 - 256
  • [6] Banerjee A, 2005, J MACH LEARN RES, V6, P1705
  • [7] Bregman L., 1967, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, V7, P207
  • [8] Calinski T., 1974, COMMUN STAT, V3, P1, DOI [10.1080/03610927408827101, DOI 10.1080/03610927408827101]
  • [9] Capo M., 2020, IEEE T KNOWL DATA EN, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/TKDE.2020.3002926
  • [10] CLUSTER SEPARATION MEASURE
    DAVIES, DL
    BOULDIN, DW
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1979, 1 (02) : 224 - 227