A comparison of best-worst scaling marginal and rank methods

被引：4

作者：

Cheng, Haotian ^{[1
]}

Feuz, Ryan ^{[2
]}

Lambert, Dayton M. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Arizona, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA

[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Appl Econ, Logan, UT USA

[3] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Stillwater, OK USA

来源：

APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS | 2024年 / 31卷 / 15期

关键词：

Best-worst scaling; Monte Carlo experiment; marginal method; rank methods; CHOICE DATA;

D O I：

10.1080/13504851.2023.2187019

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

This study compares the marginal and the rank methods for analysing best-worst scaling case 2 data using a simulated and an empirical example dataset. Simulation results suggest the rank method improves accuracy of estimates compared to the marginal method as measured by bias and mean square error. The rank method reduced bias on average by 48% across all coefficient estimates as compared to the marginal-CL method. Results from the empirical example align with those of the simulation and added robustness to the findings.

引用

页码：1379 / 1382

页数：4

共 50 条

[1] Comparison of statistical analysis methods for object case best-worst scaling
Cheung, Kei Long
Mayer, Susanne
Simon, Judit
de Vries, Hein
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
Kremer, Ingrid E. H.
Hiligsmann, Mickael
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 22 (06) : 509 - 515
[2] When is best-worst best? A comparison of best-worst scaling, numeric estimation, and rating scales for collection of semantic norms
Hollis, Geoff
Westbury, Chris
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (01) : 115 - 133
[3] When is best-worst best? A comparison of best-worst scaling, numeric estimation, and rating scales for collection of semantic norms
Geoff Hollis
Chris Westbury
Behavior Research Methods, 2018, 50 : 115 - 133
[4] Best-Worst Scaling with many items
Chrzan, Keith
Peitz, Megan
JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2019, 30 : 61 - 72
[5] A best-worst scaling in Colombian patients to rank the characteristics of HIV/AIDS treatment
Hendriks, A.
Wijnen, B.
van Engelen, R.
Conde, R.
Evers, S. M.
Gonzalez, J.
Govers, M.
Muehlbacher, A.
Hiligsmann, M.
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (05) : 468 - 473
[6] Estimating preferences for a dermatology consultation using Best-Worst Scaling: Comparison of various methods of analysis
Terry N Flynn
Jordan J Louviere
Tim J Peters
Joanna Coast
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8
[7] A comparison of Best-Worst Scaling and Likert Scale methods on peer-to-peer accommodation attributes
Heo, Cindy Yoonjoung
Kim, Bona
Park, Kwangsoo
Back, Robin M.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 148 : 368 - 377
[8] A formal and empirical comparison of two score measures for best-worst scaling
Marley, A. A. J.
Islam, T.
Hawkins, G. E.
JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2016, 21 : 15 - 24
[9] Comparison of rating, best-worst scaling, and adolescents' real choices of snacks
Mielby, Line Holler
Edelenbos, Merete
Thybo, Anette Kistrup
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2012, 25 (02) : 140 - 147
[10] Comparison of best-worst and hedonic scaling for the measurement of consumer wine preferences
Mueller, S.
Francis, I. L.
Lockshin, L.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GRAPE AND WINE RESEARCH, 2009, 15 (03) : 205 - 215

← 1 2 3 4 5 →