THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VASOPRESSORS FOR SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

被引:12
作者
Jia, Lu [1 ]
Wang, Pufeng [1 ]
Li, Cong [1 ]
Xie, Jianfeng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Crit Care Med, Zhongda Hosp,Sch Med, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Crit Care Med, Zhongda Hosp,Sch Med, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
SHOCK | 2023年 / 60卷 / 06期
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Septic shock; sepsis; vasopressors; vasoactive drugs; network meta-analysis; CE-catecholamines; DA-dopamine; DB-dobutamine; DX-dopexamine; EP-epinephrine; EX-enoximone; GRADE-Grades of Recommendation; Assessment; Development and Evaluation; ICU-intensive care unit; LE-levosimendan; LOS-length of stay; NE-norepinephrine; OR-odds ratio; PA-placebo; PE-phenylephrine; RCTS-randomized controlled trials; RR-risk ratio; SP-selepressin; SUCRA-surface under the cumulative ranking curve; TP-terlipressin; VP-vasopressin; NOREPINEPHRINE; TERLIPRESSIN; DOBUTAMINE; DOPAMINE; EPINEPHRINE; MANAGEMENT; SEPSIS; INFUSION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/SHK.0000000000002193
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Septic shock is a distributive shock with decreased systemic vascular resistance and MAP. Septic shock contributes to the most common causes of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). Current guidelines recommend the use of norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor, whereas adrenergic agonists and vasopressin analogs are also commonly used by physicians. To date, very few studies have synthetically compared the effects of multiple types of vasoactive medications. The aim of this study was to systemically evaluate the efficacy of vasoactive agents both individually and in combination to treat septic shock. Methods: The PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched up to May 12, 2022, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of different types of vasopressors. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was the ICU length of stay. Adverse events are defined as any undesirable outcomes, including myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmia, peripheral ischemia, or stroke and cerebrovascular events. Findings: Thirty-three randomized controlled trials comprising 4,966 patients and assessing 8 types of vasoactive treatments were included in the network meta-analysis. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve provided a ranking of vasoactive medications in terms of 28-day all-cause mortality from most effective to least effective: norepinephrine plus dobutamine, epinephrine, vasopressin, terlipressin, norepinephrine, norepinephrine plus vasopressin, dopamine, and dobutamine. Dopamine was associated with a significantly shorter ICU stay than norepinephrine, terlipressin, and vasopressin, whereas other vasoactive medications showed no definite difference in ICU length of stay. Regarding adverse events, norepinephrine was associated with the highest incidences of myocardial infarction and peripheral ischemia. Dopamine was associated with the highest incidence of cardiac arrhythmia. Epinephrine and terlipressin were associated with the highest incidences of myocardial infarction and peripheral ischemia. Interpretation: The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that norepinephrine plus dobutamine is associated with a lower risk of 28-day mortality in septic shock patients than other vasoactive medications, and the use of dopamine is associated with a higher risk of 28-day mortality due to septic shock than norepinephrine, terlipressin, and vasopressin.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 752
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   CLINICAL EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TERLIPRESSIN ADMINISTRATION IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK [J].
Acevedo, J. G. ;
Fernandez, J. ;
Escorsell, A. ;
Mas, A. ;
Gines, P. ;
Arroyo, V. .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 50 :S73-S73
[2]   Terlipressin or norepinephrine in hyperdynamic septic shock:: A prospective, randomized study [J].
Albanese, Jacques ;
Leone, Marc ;
Delmas, Anne ;
Martin, Claude .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (09) :1897-1902
[3]   Levosimendan vs dobutamine in septic shock [J].
Alhashemi, Jamal A. ;
Alotaibi, Qamar A. ;
Abdullah, Ghadah M. ;
Shalabi, Sanaa A. .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 24 (03) :e14-e15
[4]   Current epidemiology of septic shock - The CUB-Rea network [J].
Annane, D ;
Aegerter, P ;
Jars-Guincestre, MC ;
Guidet, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 168 (02) :165-172
[5]   Norepinephrine plus dobutamine versus epinephrine alone for management of septic shock:: a randomised trial [J].
Annane, Djillali ;
Vignon, Philippe ;
Renault, Alain ;
Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard ;
Charpentier, Claire ;
Martin, Claude ;
Troche, Gilles ;
Ricard, Jean-Damien ;
Nitenberg, Gerard ;
Papazian, Laurent ;
Azoulay, Elie ;
Bellissant, Eric .
LANCET, 2007, 370 (9588) :676-684
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Clin Educ Gen Pract
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Shandong Med J
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Chin Arch Gen Surg
[9]  
Barzegar E, 2017, INDIAN J CRIT CARE M, V21, P578, DOI 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_258_17
[10]  
Barzegar Elchin, 2016, Acta Med Iran, V54, P15