Finite element analysis of minimally invasive nail placement and traditional nail placement in the treatment of lumbar 1 vertebral compression fracture

被引:1
作者
Huang, Chunbo [1 ]
Zhang, Chunling [2 ,3 ]
Su, Feng [2 ]
Su, Liu [2 ]
Ma, Pengpeng [2 ]
Zong, Zhiguo [2 ]
Zhang, Xin [2 ]
Li, Wei [2 ]
Cai, Ming [2 ]
机构
[1] Hebei North Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Zhangjiakou, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei North Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Orthoped, Zhangjiakou, Peoples R China
[3] Hebei North Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Orthoped, 26 Changqing Rd, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
finite element analysis; pedicle screw fixation; thoracolumbar fractures; MANAGEMENT; SPINE; INSTRUMENTATION; FUSION;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000034145
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Using the finite element analysis method to help us better understand the biomechanical changes of the spine after surgery and the changes in the stress distribution around the screw implantation area. The finite element model of L1 vertebral compression fracture was constructed by using a large number of finite element programs. On the fracture model, 2 kinds of internal fixation devices are set up, namely: the first type of 4 screws across the injured vertebra through the adjacent upper and lower vertebrae + transverse connector; the second type of 4 screws crosses the injured vertebra through the adjacent upper and lower vertebrae + non-transverse connector. To study the distribution of the maximum displacement and von Mises stress of the intramedullary pedicle screws and rods of the 2 types of internal fixation devices after implantation in the spine under certain loading conditions. In traditional open pedicle screw fixation, the maximum stress in the pedicle screw fixation system in the direction of 3D movement is higher than in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. There is no significant difference in the Von Mises stress of the pedicle screw between the 2 procedures when the spine performs flexion-extension and lateral flexion activities. When the spine is rotating axially, the Von Mises stress of the pedicle screw in conventional open surgery is significantly less than that of the screw in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Traditional open internal fixation produces stress peaks of 891.7 MPa and 886.34 MPa at the transverse joint during axial rotation. Only when the spine is rotating in the axial direction, the maximum displacement of traditional open pedicle screw fixation is smaller than that of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. There is no significant difference in the maximum displacement between the 2 procedures when the spine is moving in other directions. Traditional open pedicle screw fixation can strengthen the stability of the spine in the direction of axial rotation, and can also be greater to reduce the maximum stress of the pedicle screw axial rotation, so the clinical treatment of unstable fractures of the thoracolumbar spine instability is of great significance.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Contralateral bridge fixation of freehand minimally invasive pedicle screws combined with unilateral MIS-TLIF vs. open TLIF in the treatment of multi-segmental lumbar degenerative diseases: A five years retrospective study and finite element analysis
    Zhang, Yingkai
    Zhou, Tianyao
    Gu, Yutong
    Che, Wu
    Zhang, Liang
    Wang, Yichao
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [42] Effect of different designs of minimally invasive cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses replacing mandibular premolar: Long-term fracture load and 3D finite element analysis
    Kasem, Ammar T.
    Elsherbiny, Abdallah Ahmed
    Abo-Madina, Manal
    Tribst, Joao Paulo M.
    Al-Zordk, Walid
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 32 (03): : E41 - E51
  • [43] Design of Improved Intertrochanteric Fracture Treatment (DRIFT) Study: Protocol for Biomechanical Testing and Finite Element Analysis of Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated With Intramedullary Nailing or Dynamic Compression Screw
    Panagopoulos, Andreas
    Kyriakopoulos, Giorgos
    Anastopoulos, Giorgos
    Megas, Panagiotis
    Kourkoulis, Stavros K.
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2019, 8 (07):
  • [44] Biomechanical effects of S1 sacroiliac screws versus S2 sacroiliac screws on sacroiliac screws combined with a lumbar iliac fixation in the treatment of vertical sacral fractures: a biomechanical finite element analysis
    Ma, Yupeng
    Huang, Tao
    Liu, Weiwei
    Hong, Huanyu
    Zhao, Yong
    Lin, Jiangtao
    Li, Yu
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)