Remote follow-up based on patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: A qualitative study of patient perspectives

被引:9
作者
Grove, Birgith Engelst [1 ,2 ]
Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen [1 ]
Ivarsen, Per [2 ,3 ]
Hjollund, Niels Henrik [1 ,4 ]
de Thurah, Annette [2 ,5 ]
Mejdahl, Caroline Trillingsgaard [6 ]
机构
[1] Godstrup Hosp, Ctr Patient Reported Outcomes, AmbuFlex, Herning, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Renal Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] DEFACTUM, Publ Hlth & Hlth Serv Res, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
CARE; GUIDELINES; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0281393
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in outpatient follow-up. PRO-based remote follow-up offers a new healthcare delivery model, where PROs are used as the basis for outpatient follow-up in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, the patient's perspective of this novel remote care delivery remains unknown. ObjectivesThis study aimed to explore the patients' experiences using PROs in remote care and how this mode of follow-up may enhance patient engagement. DesignA qualitative approach was employed, guided by Focused Ethnography and Interpretive Description. ParticipantsPurposively, 15 patients with chronic kidney disease experienced with PRO-based remote follow-up in 3 renal outpatient clinics in the Central Denmark Region, were recruited. MeasuresField studies comprising participant observation in remote PRO consultations and individual, semi-structured interviews with the patients constituted the empirical data. Thematic analysis was performed according to Braun and Clarke's six-phase process. ResultsPRO-based remote follow-up may enhance patient engagement by a) improving communication, b) increasing disease knowledge, c) inducing flexibility, d) ensuring clinician feedback on PRO data, and e) prompting clinical action. Barriers to enhanced patient engagement were identified as a) lack of feedback on PRO data, b) lower disease knowledge, c) PRO in competition with biomedical data, and d) loss of personal relation. ConclusionPRO-based follow-up in remote care holds several advantages for the patients. However, some barriers need clinical awareness before PROs may enhance the patients' engagement in remote follow-up. Future studies should explore the impact of involving relatives in PRO-based follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]  
Mejdahl CT, 2018, PATIENT REPORTED OUT
[42]  
Mejdahl TC., 2016, European J Pers Cent Healthc, V4, P359, DOI 10.5750/ejpch.v4i2.1125
[43]   CONSTRUCTING ETHNICITY - CREATING AND RECREATING ETHNIC-IDENTITY AND CULTURE [J].
NAGEL, J .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1994, 41 (01) :152-176
[44]   Patient perspectives on digital patient reported outcomes in routine care of inflammatory bowel disease [J].
Nielsen, Amalie Sogaard ;
Appel, Charlotte W. ;
Larsen, Birgit Furstrand ;
Kayser, Lars ;
Hanna, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2021, 5 (01)
[45]   Satisfaction with care and adherence to treatment when using patient reported outcomes to individualize follow-up care for women with early breast cancer - a pilot randomized controlled trial [J].
Riis, Cathrine L. ;
Jensen, Pernille T. ;
Bechmann, Troels ;
Moller, Soren ;
Coulter, Angela ;
Steffensen, Karina D. .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2020, 59 (04) :444-452
[46]   Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management [J].
Santana, Maria-Jose ;
Feeny, David .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (05) :1505-1513
[47]   AmbuFlex: tele-patient-reported outcomes (telePRO) as the basis for follow-up in chronic and malignant diseases [J].
Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen ;
Larsen, Louise Pape ;
Jessen, Anne ;
Sidenius, Per ;
Dorflinger, Liv ;
de Thurah, Annette ;
Hjollund, Niels Henrik .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (03) :525-534
[48]  
Spradley JP., 1980, Participant observation
[49]  
Thorne S, 1997, RES NURS HEALTH, V20, P169
[50]  
Thorne S, 2016, DEV QUAL INQ, V2