Remote follow-up based on patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: A qualitative study of patient perspectives

被引:9
作者
Grove, Birgith Engelst [1 ,2 ]
Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen [1 ]
Ivarsen, Per [2 ,3 ]
Hjollund, Niels Henrik [1 ,4 ]
de Thurah, Annette [2 ,5 ]
Mejdahl, Caroline Trillingsgaard [6 ]
机构
[1] Godstrup Hosp, Ctr Patient Reported Outcomes, AmbuFlex, Herning, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Renal Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] DEFACTUM, Publ Hlth & Hlth Serv Res, Aarhus, Denmark
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
CARE; GUIDELINES; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0281393
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in outpatient follow-up. PRO-based remote follow-up offers a new healthcare delivery model, where PROs are used as the basis for outpatient follow-up in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, the patient's perspective of this novel remote care delivery remains unknown. ObjectivesThis study aimed to explore the patients' experiences using PROs in remote care and how this mode of follow-up may enhance patient engagement. DesignA qualitative approach was employed, guided by Focused Ethnography and Interpretive Description. ParticipantsPurposively, 15 patients with chronic kidney disease experienced with PRO-based remote follow-up in 3 renal outpatient clinics in the Central Denmark Region, were recruited. MeasuresField studies comprising participant observation in remote PRO consultations and individual, semi-structured interviews with the patients constituted the empirical data. Thematic analysis was performed according to Braun and Clarke's six-phase process. ResultsPRO-based remote follow-up may enhance patient engagement by a) improving communication, b) increasing disease knowledge, c) inducing flexibility, d) ensuring clinician feedback on PRO data, and e) prompting clinical action. Barriers to enhanced patient engagement were identified as a) lack of feedback on PRO data, b) lower disease knowledge, c) PRO in competition with biomedical data, and d) loss of personal relation. ConclusionPRO-based follow-up in remote care holds several advantages for the patients. However, some barriers need clinical awareness before PROs may enhance the patients' engagement in remote follow-up. Future studies should explore the impact of involving relatives in PRO-based follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Comparing Patients' Experiences with Electronic and Traditional Consultation: Results from a Multisite Survey [J].
Ackerman, Sara L. ;
Gleason, Nathaniel ;
Shipman, Scott A. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (04) :1135-1142
[2]   SYMPTOM BURDEN IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: A REVIEW OF RECENT LITERATURE [J].
Almutary, Hayfa ;
Bonner, Ann ;
Douglas, Clint .
JOURNAL OF RENAL CARE, 2013, 39 (03) :140-150
[3]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Nvivo
[5]   Application of telemedicine and eHealth technology for clinical services in response to COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Bokolo, Anthony Jnr. .
HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 11 (02) :359-366
[6]   Patient-reported outcomes: Assessment and current perspectives of the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration and the reflection paper of the European Medicines Agency [J].
Bottomley, Andrew ;
Jones, Dave ;
Claassens, Lily .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (03) :347-353
[7]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[8]   Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies [J].
Campbell, Rachel ;
Ju, Angela ;
King, Madeleine T. ;
Rutherford, Claudia .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (06) :1597-1620
[9]   Using qualitative evidence on patients' views to help understand variation in effectiveness of complex interventions: a qualitative comparative analysis [J].
Candy, Bridget ;
King, Michael ;
Jones, Louise ;
Oliver, Sandy .
TRIALS, 2013, 14
[10]   Patients' experiences and perspectives of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis [J].
Carfora, Liam ;
Foley, Ciara M. ;
Hagi-Diakou, Phillip ;
Lesty, Phillip J. ;
Sandstrom, Marianne L. ;
Ramsey, Imogen ;
Kumar, Saravana .
PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04)