Robotic approach mitigates the effect of major complications on survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer

被引:10
作者
Meyyappan, Thiagarajan [1 ]
Wilson, Greg C. [2 ]
Zeh, Herbert J. [3 ]
Hogg, Melissa E. [4 ]
Lee, Kenneth K. [1 ]
Zureikat, Amer H. [1 ]
Paniccia, Alessandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Surg Oncol, Med Ctr, 3550 Terrace St,A425 Scaife Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX USA
[4] NorthShore Hosp, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2023年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
Robotics; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Periampullary cancer; Whipple; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; MORTALITY; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-022-09638-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Major complications (MCs) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are a known independent predictor of worse oncologic outcomes. There are limited data on the effect of major complications on long-term outcomes after robotic PD (RPD). The aim of this study is to compare the effect of MC on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after RPD and open PD (OPD). Methods This is a single-center, retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing PD for periampullary cancer including ampullary adenocarcinoma, distal cholangiocarcinoma, and duodenal carcinoma. Univariate analysis was performed on all clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors. MCs were defined as Clavien-Dindo >= grade 3. Kaplan-Maier survival analysis was performed with log-rank test for group comparison. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS) in both the OPD and RPD groups. Results A total of 190 patients with ampullary carcinoma (n = 98), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 55), and duodenal adenocarcinoma (n = 37) were examined over the study period with 61.1% (n = 116) undergoing RPD and 38.9% (n = 74) undergoing OPD. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the RPD and OPD cohorts. Furthermore, R0 resection rates, tumor size, and lymph node involvement were similar between the RPD and OPD cohorts. OPD had higher rate of MC (40.5% vs 28.3% in RPD, p = 0.011) including clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (25.7% vs 8.6%, p = 0.001) and wound infection (34.5% vs 13.8%, p < 0.001). MCs were associated with a lower OS in the OPD cohort (HR = 2.18, 95%CI 1.0-4.55, p = 0.038). MCs were not associated with OS in the RPD cohort (HR = 1.55, 95%CI 0.87-2.76, p = 0.14). Conclusion MCs are associated with worse patient outcomes after OPD but not after RPD. Robotic approach mitigates and possibly abrogates the negative effects of MCs on patient outcomes after PD for malignancy and is associated with improved adjuvant chemotherapy completion rates. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1187
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison of complications and cost to the open approach [J].
Baker, E. H. ;
Ross, S. W. ;
Seshadri, R. ;
Swan, R. Z. ;
Iannitti, D. A. ;
Vrochides, D. ;
Martinie, J. B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2016, 12 (03) :554-560
[2]   Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis from a French multicentric cohort [J].
Bergeat, Damien ;
Turrini, Olivier ;
Courtin-Tanguy, Laetitia ;
Truant, Stephanie ;
Darnis, Benjamin ;
Delpero, Jean Robert ;
Mabrut, Jean-Yves ;
Regenet, Nicolas ;
Sulpice, Laurent .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2018, 403 (06) :701-709
[3]   Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is Associated with Decreased Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistulas: a Propensity-Matched Analysis [J].
Cai, Jianpeng ;
Ramanathan, Rajesh ;
Zenati, Mazen S. ;
Al Abbas, Amr ;
Hogg, Melissa E. ;
Zeh, Herbert J. ;
Zureikat, Amer H. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2020, 24 (05) :1111-1118
[4]   Robotic approach mitigates perioperative morbidity in obese patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Girgis, Mark D. ;
Zenati, Mazen S. ;
Steve, Jennifer ;
Bartlett, David L. ;
Zureikat, Amer ;
Zeh, Herbert J. ;
Hogg, Melissa E. .
HPB, 2017, 19 (02) :93-98
[5]  
Holzheimer R.G., 2001, SURG TREATMENT EVIDE
[6]   Prognostic factors and benefits of adjuvant therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma: Mayo Clinic experience [J].
Jin, Zhaohui ;
Hartgers, Mindy L. ;
Sanhueza, Cristobal T. ;
Shubert, Christopher R. ;
Alberts, Steven R. ;
Truly, Mark J. ;
Muppa, Prasuna ;
Nagorney, David M. ;
Smyrk, Thomas C. ;
Hassan, Mohamed ;
Mahipal, Amit .
EJSO, 2018, 44 (05) :677-683
[7]   Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Kim, Alex C. ;
Rist, Rebecca C. ;
Zureikat, Amer H. .
JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2019, (151)
[8]   Effect of complications on oncologic outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer [J].
Le, Anh-Thu ;
Huang, Bin ;
Hnoosh, Dima ;
Saeed, Hayder ;
Dineen, Sean P. ;
Hosein, Peter J. ;
Durbin, Eric B. ;
Kudrimoti, Mahesh ;
McGrath, Patrick C. ;
Tzeng, Ching-Wei D. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 214 :1-8
[9]   Mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: assessing early and late causes of patient death [J].
Narayanan, Sowmya ;
Martin, Allison N. ;
Turrentine, Florence E. ;
Bauer, Todd W. ;
Adams, Reid B. ;
Zaydfudim, Victor M. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 231 :304-308
[10]   Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic and open pancreatectomy in a national cohort of pancreatic adenocarcinoma [J].
Nassour, Ibrahim ;
Winters, Sharon B. ;
Hoehn, Richard ;
Tohme, Samer ;
Adam, Mohamed A. ;
Bartlett, David L. ;
Lee, Kenneth K. ;
Paniccia, Alessandro ;
Zureikat, Amer H. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 122 (02) :234-242