Are Family Firms Doing More Innovation Output With Less Innovation Input? A Replication and Extension

被引:48
作者
Block, Joern [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hansen, Christopher [4 ]
Steinmetz, Holger [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Trier Univ, Chair Management, Univ Ring 15a, D-54286 Trier, Germany
[2] Univ Witten Herdecke, Wittener Inst Familienunternehmen, Witten, Germany
[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Appl Econ, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Luxembourg, Dept Econ & Management, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[5] Leibniz Inst Psychol, Dept Big Data, Trier, Germany
关键词
family firm; innovation; meta-analytic structural equation model; replication; extension; meta-analysis; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; EVIDENCE-BASED MANAGEMENT; EFFECT SIZES; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; MODERATING ROLE; FOUNDER FIRMS; METAANALYSIS; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1177/10422587221084249
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The role of family firms in innovation and the question of whether family firms show differences in innovation investments and outcomes are intensely debated. To address these issues, Duran, Kammerlander, van Essen, and Zellweger (2016) published a meta-analytic structural equation model showing that family firms produce more innovation output with less innovation input. In the present article, we present the results of two empirical studies. Study 1 replicates the original methodological approach and study 2 provides an extension by using an updated and enlarged sample of 290 papers, adopting a more advanced multilevel approach, and controlling for firm age. The results show that while we could successfully replicate the original results of DKEZ in study 1, study 2 revealed only a weak negative effect of family firm status on innovation input and no effect on innovation output. Our results suggest that family firms are not producing more innovation output with less innovation input and that further research should focus on the heterogeneity within the group of family firms rather than simply comparing family to nonfamily firms. We close with a discussion of the methodological implications for meta-analyses in entrepreneurship research and a call for future research on family firm innovation. Our dataset and analytical procedures are publicly available.
引用
收藏
页码:1496 / 1520
页数:25
相关论文
共 138 条
[1]   Innovation and productivity in family firms: evidence from a sample of European firms [J].
Aiello, Francesco ;
Mannarino, Lidia ;
Pupo, Valeria .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 29 (04) :394-416
[2]   Does external R&D matter for family firm innovation? Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry [J].
Aiello, Francesco ;
Cardamone, Paola ;
Mannarino, Lidia ;
Pupo, Valeria .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2021, 57 (04) :1915-1930
[3]  
Aldrich H.E., 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P573, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
[4]   Retire statistical significance [J].
Amrhein, Valentin ;
Greenland, Sander ;
McShane, Blake .
NATURE, 2019, 567 (7748) :305-307
[5]   Editorial: Enhancing quantitative theory-testing entrepreneurship research [J].
Anderson, Brian S. ;
Wennberg, Karl ;
McMullen, Jeffery S. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2019, 34 (05)
[6]   Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (03) :1301-1328
[7]   Replication, Meta-Analysis, and Research Synthesis in Economics [J].
Anderson, Richard G. ;
Kichkha, Areerat .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (05) :56-59
[8]   Investment policy in family controlled fims [J].
Anderson, Ronald C. ;
Duru, Augustine ;
Reeb, David M. .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2012, 36 (06) :1744-1758
[9]   The impact of ICT on innovation activities: Evidence for UK SMEs [J].
Anon Higon, Dolores .
INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL, 2012, 30 (06) :684-699
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Practical meta-analysis effect size calculator