A three-level meta-frontier directional distance function approach for carbon emission efficiency analysis in China: convexity versus non-convexity

被引:3
作者
Chen, Ya [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Yongbin [1 ]
Ding, Tao [1 ]
Wu, Huaqing [1 ]
Deng, Guangwei [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Hefei Univ Technol, Ctr Ind informat & Econ, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei, Peoples R China
[4] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; meta-frontier; non-convexity; carbon emission efficiency; carbon peaking and carbon neutrality; FACTOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY; TECHNOLOGY GAPS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; DEA; REDUCTION; ALLOCATION; PRODUCTIVITY; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2024.2315315
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals is a fundamental requirement for advancing high-quality development in China. Carbon emission efficiency (CEE) indicates the proportion of optimal emissions to actual emissions in the production system, providing a basis for reasonable carbon emission reductions. To facilitate the realisation of China's goals, this paper analyses CEE and the carbon emission reduction potential in China from 2001 to 2020. Considering the heterogeneity of both regions and industries, this paper proposes a three-hierarchy meta-frontier directional distance function (DDF) method to measure CEE under convex and non-convex assumptions of production possibility set (PPS). The empirical results show that the assumption of convex or non-convex axiom on the innermost PPS has a great impact on efficiency distribution, and the distribution of technology gap rate (TGR) is more affected by the selection of convex or non-convex assumption compared with the distribution of CEE. Currently, China's carbon emission efficiency remains low, mostly due to management inefficiency. The primary industry has more advanced emission reduction technologies than the other two industries. The eastern region has a large potential for carbon emission reduction because of its high carbon emission base, despite its high efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:6493 / 6517
页数:25
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth
[2]   Transportation carbon emission reduction potential and mitigation strategy in China [J].
Bai, Caiquan ;
Chen, Zhijun ;
Wang, Daoping .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 873
[3]  
Chambers R.G., 1996, PAC ECON REV, V1, P181, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0106.1996.TB00184.X
[4]   Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency [J].
Chambers, RG ;
Chung, Y ;
Fare, R .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1998, 98 (02) :351-364
[5]   Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach [J].
Chang, Young-Tae ;
Zhang, Ning ;
Danao, Denise ;
Zhang, Nan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 58 :277-283
[6]   Towards carbon neutrality by implementing carbon emissions trading scheme: Policy evaluation in China [J].
Chen, Xing ;
Lin, Boqiang .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 157
[7]   Total factor energy efficiency in Chinese manufacturing industry under industry and regional heterogeneities [J].
Chen, Ya ;
Wang, Mengyuan ;
Feng, Chenpeng ;
Zhou, Huadong ;
Wang, Ke .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 168
[8]   Inclusive ecological efficiency analysis in China's Hainan Island: an extended meta-frontier DEA approach [J].
Chen, Ya ;
Xu, Wei ;
Zhang, Xiaoling ;
Zhou, Qian .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (32) :44452-44466
[9]   Total Factor Energy Efficiency, Carbon Emission Efficiency, and Technology Gap: Evidence from Sub-Industries of Anhui Province in China [J].
Chen, Ya ;
Xu, Wei ;
Zhou, Qian ;
Zhou, Zhixiang .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04)
[10]   Total-factor carbon emission efficiency of China's provincial industrial sector and its dynamic evolution [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Li, Lianshui ;
Liu, Jun ;
Zhang, Huiming .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 94 :330-339