The Path from Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy to Compliance and Cooperation in the Context of Terrorism in Multiculturally Diverse Student Population in the Netherlands

被引:1
作者
Akdogan, Huseyin [1 ]
Sozer, Mehmet Alper [2 ]
Ekici, Niyazi [3 ]
Gultekin, Sebahattin [4 ]
Cakar, Bekir
机构
[1] The Hague Univ Appl Sci, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Roger Williams Univ, Bristol, RI USA
[3] Western Illinois Univ, Dept Law Enforcement & Justice Adm, 1 Univ Cir, Macomb, IL 61455 USA
[4] Odessa Coll, Odessa, TX USA
关键词
Procedural Justice; Police Legitimacy; Compliance; Terrorism; Structural Equation Modeling; Mediation Analysis; PUBLIC COOPERATION; SUPPORT; THREATS; LAW;
D O I
10.1007/s10610-024-09574-0
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
An expanding body of research consistently reinforces Tyler's two-stage-based self-regulatory theory of procedural justice. This study makes two significant contributions to the literature on Tyler's model. First, it examines the relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy, and cooperation with police and explores whether perceptions of legitimacy have a mediation effect in this model. Second, it attempts to understand whether the model predicts the cooperation and reporting behavior of individuals in terrorism-related cases. Drawing on a comprehensive analysis of data linking procedural justice to public trust and cooperation, collected from (N = 267) university students in The Hague, results align with Tyler's model, indicating a significant positive relationship between police legitimacy and willingness to cooperate with police and report terrorism-related incidents. Procedural justice indirectly affects both variables through legitimacy. Furthermore, age and prior contact with the police influence perceptions of legitimacy and cooperation. The findings underscore the importance of police legitimacy in fostering trust and cooperation with law enforcement, particularly in multicultural societies. This study advocates for targeted resource allocation within police departments. By prioritizing initiatives that enhance procedural justice, departments can cultivate stronger legitimacy and encourage cooperation and proactive reporting of terrorism-related cases.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 345
页数:27
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Legitimacy and cooperation with the police: examining empirical relationship using data from Africa [J].
Boateng, Francis D. ;
Pryce, Daniel K. ;
Abess, Gassan .
POLICING & SOCIETY, 2022, 32 (03) :411-433
[2]   The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people's willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis [J].
Bolger, P. Colin ;
Walters, Glenn D. .
JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2019, 60 :93-99
[3]  
Bottoms A, 2012, J CRIM LAW CRIM, V102, P119
[4]   BORDER POLICING, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND BELONGING: THE LEGITIMACY OF (CR)IMMIGRATION CONTROLS IN BORDER AREAS [J].
Brouwer, Jelmer ;
Van der Woude, Maartje ;
Van der Leun, Joanne .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2018, 58 (03) :624-643
[5]  
Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3
[6]   Police and Community Cooperation in Counterterrorism: Evidence and Insights from Australia [J].
Cherney, Adrian ;
Murphy, Kristina .
STUDIES IN CONFLICT & TERRORISM, 2017, 40 (12) :1023-1037
[7]   Policing terrorism with procedural justice: The role of police legitimacy and law legitimacy [J].
Cherney, Adrian ;
Murphy, Kristina .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2013, 46 (03) :403-421
[8]   Body Worn Cameras, Procedural Justice, and Police Legitimacy: A Controlled Experimental Evaluation of Traffic Stops [J].
Demir, Mustafa ;
Apel, Robert ;
Braga, Anthony A. ;
Brunson, Rod K. ;
Ariel, Barak .
JUSTICE QUARTERLY, 2020, 37 (01) :53-84
[9]  
Ekici N., 2020, PERSPECTIVES TERRORI, V14, P62
[10]  
Europol, 2023, EUROPEAN UNION TERRO